Story Poster
Photo by Denny Medley\Big 12 Conference
Oklahoma State Basketball

Oklahoma State Falls to Texas 61-47 in Big 12 Quarterfinals

March 9, 2023
1,873

(Editor’s note: The Big 12 sent out note following the game to say the score had been changed to 61-47 following the final buzzer. Our article now shows that change.)

It was a poor shooting night for Oklahoma State for nearly 40 minutes as the Pokes fell to Texas in the Big 12 quarterfinals, 61-47.

With the loss, the Cowboys fall to 18-15 overall.

Caleb Asberry led the way in scoring for the Pokes with 16 points on 3-of-10 shooting from the field, just 1-of-6 from 3-point range. He did, however, go 9-of-11 from the free throw line.

Kalib Boone was the only other Cowboy who finished with double figures, 11 points on 4-of-8 shooting. He also finished with a quite 11 rebounds, giving him his second double-double of the season.

The Cowboys finished the game shooting just 27% from the field on 14-of-52 shooting and 14% from 3-point range and 64% from the free throw line.

It wasn’t too much better for Texas, who shot just 37% from the field and 31% from 3-point range.

The Cowboys did, however, outrebound the Longhorns 45-33, a 30-27 clip on the defensive end. But they turned the ball over 20 times, leading to 22 points on the other end.

As they did in the opening round game against Oklahoma, the Cowboys struggled mightily from the field in the first 10 minutes of the game against Texas. The Pokes went more than three minutes without scoring, as well as more than seven minutes without a field goal. They also shot just 16% from the field and went 0-for-4 from 3-point range.

However, they went nearly 88% from the free throw line, with Caleb Asberry going 6-for-6 to tie the game up at 11.

They also held the Longhorns to 28% shooting on the other end and a scoring drought of more than four minutes. The Cowboys also took their first lead since the 18-minute with two free throws from Moussa Cisse at exactly the 10-minute mark.

The Cowboys’ shooting struggles continued into the second 10 minutes of the first half as they went nearly 10 minutes without a field goal before Bryce Thompson knocked down a field goal in the paint at the 8:09 mark to tie the game up at 15.

The Longhorns went on a 10-2 run over a four-minute stretch to take their largest lead of the first half, 30-19. But the Longhorns eclipsed that lead when they went up 35-23 with :58 left in the first half.

Asberry hit the Pokes’ first 3-pointer of the first half with :45 left in the half, making it a nine-point game, 35-26.

By the break, the Cowboys had turned the ball over 11 times, leading to 15 points on the other end for the Longhorns. They also shot just 33% from the field and 16% from 3-point range.

The start of the second half was worse than the start of the first half as the Pokes shot just 6% from the field in the first nine minutes of the second half on 1-of-15 shooting. They were also 0-for-9 from 3-point range.

John-Michael Wright gave the Pokes their first three ball of the second half near the 10-minute mark, making it a 15-point game, 48-33.

The Cowboys showed some life just under four minutes left in the game with three-straight field goals, including a dunk by Kalib Boone, which was followed by a steal by Boone leading to a dunk by Asberry, making it a 10-point game, 52-42, with 3:47 left.

Cisse recorded a steal with less than a minute left in the game with the Pokes down nine, 56-47, but Boone promptly turned the ball over and called for a foul at the other end, leading to two made free throws by Rice.

The Cowboys now have to wait until Selection Sunday to find out if they’re going dancing this year.

Discussion from...

Oklahoma State Falls to Texas 61-47 in Big 12 Quarterfinals

1,647 Views | 10 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by PaloDuroPoke
RowdyRawhide
How long do you want to ignore this user?
47 points? Did we have an offensive game plan? Gunning 3 pointers from any and all locations is not a plan.

We need some team players. Does "Little Country" have any eligibility left?
RodeoPoke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
an absolutely horrid performance. Barely over .500 again this season.

what are we looking at now, maybe a play-in game? Maybe?

Zach Lancaster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
RodeoPoke said:

an absolutely horrid performance. Barely over .500 again this season.

what are we looking at now, maybe a play-in game? Maybe?


I think they'll need a few teams ahead of them to lose in order to get back in. But even then, if one of those teams barely loses, it might not be enough. If OSU would've lost to Texas by a few points and it was a good game, then maybe. Definitely put their hopes in a lot of other hands that aren't theirs.
PokeSmot75
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RodeoPoke said:

an absolutely horrid performance. Barely over .500 again this season.

what are we looking at now, maybe a play-in game? Maybe?




Don't see us in the field. Probably one win short, those losses early to Southern Illinois and UCF were huge.

Not sure where the program goes from here. I think everyone wanted Boynton to be the guy to right the ship but it just doesn't seem to be happening. Seems like every team he puts out there is the island of misfit toys. I don't think he's a bad coach or recruiter, but IMO he's a terrible roster builder.
thetruth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PaloDuroPoke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Great time here in KC regardless of the poor showing of my pokes. One thing Is for sure, I wouldn't want to coach. You got too choices, coddle the AAU culture and limit your development (Boyton) or tough love and old school (TT and TCU coaches). Either way you can't win. Add to the challenge of an ever evolving roster and it's almost impossible to win unless you have tradition, elite talent or character players (Iowa State). I'm in the keep our coach and let him build something camp. Great character, good recruiting, and represents my university the way I want. He will continue to improve.

We need shooters. Incredible defense and effort. Go Pokes!!!

RodeoPoke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PaloDuroPoke said:

I'm in the keep our coach and let him build something camp. Great character, good recruiting, and represents my university the way I want. He will continue to improve.



heck, Ford had Great character, good recruiting and represented the University tremendously, and he got booted even though he did a whole lot more than this coach.... just saying that I think we've established that those 3 things are not sufficient, at least they were not for Ford.

I think you have to go back to Hansen to find an OSU coach that has done less than this guy.
PaloDuroPoke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We can agree to disagree. I prefer the Scott Drew model of patience and growth and not the revolving door of poke and Hope. I'm disappointed in how we ended the year but also proud of how hard most of them play. Coach filled some gaps this year and is recruiting kids with a higher bb IQ then initially. Without Avery leading us we just didn't have a threat offensively past jacking up threes. Our posts are incredible but limited offensively. Our transfers and Thompson were good but not good enough without Anderson distributing and driving. Need guards and shooters in the worst way. I don't think coaching was the problem. Just my opinion. It's worth about the same as the next, not much.
RodeoPoke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PaloDuroPoke said:

We can agree to disagree. I prefer the Scott Drew model of patience and growth and not the revolving door of poke and Hope. I'm disappointed in how we ended the year but also proud of how hard most of them play. Coach filled some gaps this year and is recruiting kids with a higher bb IQ then initially. Without Avery leading us we just didn't have a threat offensively past jacking up threes. Our posts are incredible but limited offensively. Our transfers and Thompson were good but not good enough without Anderson distributing and driving. Need guards and shooters in the worst way. I don't think coaching was the problem. Just my opinion. It's worth about the same as the next, not much.
you could have said the same thing about last year's team and the team before and the team before.... we have been so bad at PG play that we had Cunningham bringing the dang ball down.

Anderson was a good defender, usually playing their best opponent, that's what we miss... nothing else really changed, Asberry has been very good at filling in. Anderson averaged about 13 pts and since he's been gone, Thompson, Wright and Asberry have all averaged 13 points in those 8 games.

I don't think we're watching the same team.... I think that coaching is the problem... we have no set plays, no give and goes (at least that work), our plays out of a timeout never work, and we can't seem to get the ball inside regularly even though we often have a height advantage.

I don't have any answers, but it is clear that something just isn't working, and he's had six full years (3 should be plenty for basketball to turn things around).

Now we have 5 kids in the next class with only one player out of eligibility. There is simply no stability, with 5 guys leaving last year, several the year before and the year before that, and apparently next year just to make room for the rookies.
PaloDuroPoke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No stability? Welcome to college basketball. Avery is an elite defender and we agree on that huge loss but our defense held up. Avery's ability to get to the rim and open up others was felt just as strongly. With Avery, we would still be playing in my opinion.

We weren't playing for anything last year (thank you NCAA) and Cade is point guard but it's ok we disagree.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.