Story Poster
Photo by Alonzo Adams-USA TODAY Sports
Oklahoma State Basketball

Oklahoma State Is Very Active in the Transfer Portal

April 7, 2021
3,686

STILLWATER – Oklahoma State has been on the receiving end of a few successful ventures into the portal with Kendall Smith and Bryce Williams. They’ve also lost quite a few players, as has every other team in college basketball. The transfer portal is literally a give and/or take operation, but it’s certainly beneficial, which is why Mike Boynton and Co. are being so active in the portal this spring.

There’s a rather extensive list of players the coaching staff has reached out to over the past few weeks who have a legitimate chance of making a pretty decent impact over the next few seasons.

We’ll start this list with a player I wrote about a few days ago, Damari Monsanto out of East Tennessee State, the Southern Conference Freshman of the Year this past season.

Monsanto is a 6-6, 225-pound wing out of Pembroke Pines, FL, who released his top-six list this past Sunday. Joining the Cowboys is Arkansas, Butler, Iowa State, Virginia and Wake Forest. He redshirted the 2019-20 season, but averaged 11.8 points a game, second on the team in scoring, on 41% shooting from the field. He also led the team in rebounds with 7.3 per game. Those numbers jumped up in conference play to 13.2 points and 8.0 rebounds per game.

Jayden Gardner – 6-7, 235-pound forward – East Carolina

Next up is East Carolina forward Jayden Gardner. Boynton and Co. met virtually with Gardner this past Monday. The Cowboys are among several schools, including Pittsburgh, LSU, Arkansas and Miami who have either made contact or met virtually with Gardner. He had a monster season this past year as a junior. He started 18 out of 19 game and averaged 18.3 points and 8.3 rebounds per game, but those numbers weren’t a fluke. Gardner posted 19.7 points and 9.2 rebounds in 2019-20 and 16.3 points and 8.5 rebounds in 2018-19. Gardner would certainly be a huge addition to the roster.

Cam’Ron Fletcher – 6-6, 215-pounds – Kentucky

We’re gonna take a look at Kentucky transfer freshman Cam’Ron Fletcher, who had a bit of a rocky start with the Wildcats. Played in just nine games this past season, Fletcher averaged just 1.7 points and 1.7 rebounds per game but missed close to two months of the season after and outburst on the bench following a 75-63 loss to North Carolina. The outburst was based on Fletcher feeling he wasn’t getting enough playing time.

He was a top-70 prospect out of high school in Missouri, where he averaged 20.6 points and 9.8 rebounds per game. Along with Oklahoma State, Florida State, Marquette, Memphis, Tennessee, UCLA and USC are in the mix.

Jawaun Daniels – 6-7, 190-pounds – Prairie View A&M

Originally out of Harlem, NY, Daniels had a monster junior season after missing nearly all of the 2019-20 season with an injury. Starting in 20 games this past year, Daniels averaged an impressive 15.1 points and 6.1 rebounds per game, leading to being named to the Southwestern Athletic Conference Second Team. Teams who have been in contact with Daniels include Oklahoma State, New Mexico State, Loyola Chicago, Creighton, UMass, Towson and Rice among others.

Xavier Cork – 6-9, 235-pounds – Western Carolina

Cork is another interesting player to keep an eye on. Originally out of Sulphur Springs, TX, Cork has reportedly narrowed his list down to Oklahoma State, Abilene Christian, Boston College, Colorado State, North Texas, SMU, TCU, Texas A&M, UCF and Virginia Tech. Cork had a solid sophomore season as he started in all 27 games. He led both WCU and the Southern Conference in shooting percentage at 64.1% from the field while 12.7 points and 6.1 rebounds per game.

Discussion from...

Oklahoma State Is Very Active in the Transfer Portal

3,336 Views | 8 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by CaliforniaCowboy
CaliforniaCowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
here's the need...

14. LIAM ROBBINS, C, MINNESOTA

2020-21 stats: 11.7 points, 6.6 rebounds and 2.7 blocks per game.

The road for Liam Robbins has been a winding one. From pretty much unknown as a high schooler in Iowa, to a Kansas prep school and then back to his home state to attend Drake. After taking a huge step as a sophomore at Drake, Robbins hit the portal last season and received a waiver to be immediately eligible at Minnesota last season where he led the Big Ten in blocked shots.

Now with Richard Pitino fired, Robbins is back in the portal. Luka Garza is gone at Iowa and Jack Nunge is transferring, if Robbins wanted to go home again the fit would seem to be there. But, a seven-footer like him will be in high demand so he'll have plenty of options.
LS1Z28
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LS1Z28
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's odd, the tweet I tried to post didn't imbed properly. Anyways, Jayden Gardner released his top 5 schools yesterday, and we didn't make the cut. That's too bad, because he looked like a really good player.

We really need the NCAA to rule on our appeal. It's got to be hard to recruit and land transfers with the possibility of a postseason ban hanging over our head.
CaliforniaCowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IMO, it's clear that the post season ban penalty has passed... they would look soooo silly trying to enforce that after letting us play in the big dance.

and... there is no precedent for that penalty.
LS1Z28
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CaliforniaCowboy said:

IMO, it's clear that the post season ban penalty has passed... they would look soooo silly trying to enforce that after letting us play in the big dance.

and... there is no precedent for that penalty.
I hope you're right. I've given up trying to predict what the NCAA will do. They don't seem to have a lot of common sense at times. It's insane that they gave us a postseason ban when our program didn't even benefit from the violations.

It will be really interesting to see what they do with Kansas. We had 1 level 1 violation, but they had 5. They should get a multi-year postseason ban if they use our punishment as precedents. I can't see the NCAA doing that to a blue blood program though. There would be too much money lost.

I'm starting to think the NCAA's days are numbered. We'll see.
CaliforniaCowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
we did have a player that was involved though, which is what put us over the top toward harsher penalty... he was suspended 3 games.

by extension, if the player is benefiting, then the "program" is benefiting.... so, statements about program not benefiting are not exactly factual.

"The NCAA" is a collaboration of University Presidents, nothing more. It's not going anywhere... not ever. (well, never say never, but something radical like splitting Div 1-A in halves of "haves and have-nots", might trigger some form of different oversight - but there will always be a need for NCAA type oversight to keep the cheaters in line.

"IF", the NCAA disappears, it will simply be replaced with something similar - the NCAA type structure is required and is necessary, and is not independent. The presidents created it, and the president's make the rules - NOT the NCAA.
LS1Z28
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CaliforniaCowboy said:

we did have a player that was involved though, which is what put us over the top toward harsher penalty... he was suspended 3 games.

by extension, if the player is benefiting, then the "program" is benefiting.... so, statements about program not benefiting are not exactly factual.

"The NCAA" is a collaboration of University Presidents, nothing more. It's not going anywhere... not ever. (well, never say never, but something radical like splitting Div 1-A in halves of "haves and have-nots", might trigger some form of different oversight - but there will always be a need for NCAA type oversight to keep the cheaters in line.

"IF", the NCAA disappears, it will simply be replaced with something similar - the NCAA type structure is required and is necessary, and is not independent. The presidents created it, and the president's make the rules - NOT the NCAA.
That's true. Evans & Carroll were part of the program, so the program did benefit, but what I meant is that we didn't benefit from a competitive standpoint. So the penalty seems disproportionate to the violations.

It will be interesting to see what happens with the NCAA. I could see a scenario where the P5 break off from the rest of the NCAA and form their own organization. This may be a necessary evil if players start getting paid, because smaller schools won't be able to do that. I kind of hope that that never happens, because I don't want to see collegiate athletics become semi-professional sports. We'll see how things play out. The next 5-10 years could be really interesting.
CaliforniaCowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
yeah... sort of...

I suppose the question is, "would we" have benefitted as a program if we had not been busted, and we had a coach that was enticing kids with promises of agent services? IMO, we (OSU) crossed the line in that regard, whether we wanted to or not. One bad apple does spoil the whole bunch.

Regarding the NCAA, if you're talking about football, then maybe, but most of the Div 1 NCAA programs are in basketball, baseball, golf, etc.

Gonzaga this year is a good example of that, as well as all the wrestling schools in the B12 just to create a makeshift conference.

I think the whole thing is way more complicated than you're suggesting, and a break only along football P5 lines just doesn't seem practical, at least to me.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.