Story Poster
Photo by Mark J. Rebilas-USA TODAY Sports
Oklahoma State Football

Oklahoma State Comeback Falls Short as Pokes Lose 24-17 to Wisconsin

December 28, 2022
3,439

Oklahoma State made a game of it in the second half after a rough start, but the comeback came up a bit short as the Pokes lose to Wisconsin in the Guaranteed Rate Bowl, 24-17.

With the loss, the Cowboys finish the season with a 7-6 overall record, 4-5 in Big 12 play.

Garret Rangel, in just his fourth appearance of the season, third start, went 14-of-31 for 229 yards and two touchdowns and two interceptions.

Ollie Gordon led the way on the ground for the Pokes with 12 carries for 45 yards. He also had one reception for one yard and one touchdown. It was Brennan Presley who led the way in receiving for the Pokes with six catches for 74 yards. However, freshman Stephon Johnson Jr. led the way in receiving yards with 84 yards on one catch, which went for a touchdown.

Redshirt senior safety Jason Taylor II led the way on defense for the Pokes with 12 total tackles, eight of which were solo stops, and 1.5 tackles for loss.

“They called my name, I dropped two balls earlier, so I had to make a play and they gave me a chance,” Presley told the Cowboy Radio Network.

As a team, the Cowboys rushed for just 52 yards on 26 carries with no touchdowns. On the flip side of the stat sheet, they allowed the Badgers to rush for 258 yards and two touchdowns on 47 carries.

“It’s the same story all year, we’re just limited right now in some areas, and we can’t rush the football. When you can’t rush it, you can’t throw it,” Mike Gundy told the Cowboy Radio Network. “We’re gonna work hard in the offseason. That’ll force our defense to be a better run defense team. These numbers we gave up tonight rushing are a little bit skewed; [Wisconsin] hit a 60-yard reverse and they had another outside play off a misdirection that padded the rushing stats, but the fact of the matter is, they were on the field the whole night. So, if our offense was just able to produce a few plays to keep them off the field, we would’ve been in decent shape.”

The Pokes were very solid the first quarter of play as it was a fairly similar stat comparison for both sides. It was the Badgers who struck first, a 47-yard field goal by Nate Van Zelst after a solid stop by Trey Rucker. After a stalled drive, leading to a 40-yard punt by Logan Ward, Rucker came up with another impressive stop as he intercepted a pass from Chase Wolf in the end zone, which set up the longest receiving play in OSU’s bowl history.

“My mindset going into, like you said, I missed the whole season, I just wanted to get back into the groove,” Trey Rucker told the Cowboy Radio Network. “It was great; I just wanted to have fun with my teammates, one last ride with ‘em, the seniors, even though I missed the season. My mindset coming out was just dominate.”

True freshman quarterback Garret Rangel hit Stephon Johnson Jr. two yards behind the line of scrimmage on the screen pass, but it was Boogie who made the magic as he found the end zone from 84-yards out. It marked the longest receiving play in a bowl game for the Pokes and the second-longest receiving play in the Guaranteed Rate Bowl’s history.

Other than a handful of individual plays, that was all the momentum the Pokes could muster in the first half as the Badgers controlled multiple aspects of the stat sheet, including time of possession, 23:10 to 6:50, as well as total plays, 42 to just 22 for the Pokes.

The Pokes also went 0-6 on third downs in the first half.

Not much happened for the Pokes in the first 10 minutes of the second half, that is until safety Lyrik Rawls recorded a strip sack, which was recovered by defensive end Kody Walterscheid, giving the Pokes the ball on the Badgers’ 42-yard line.

That was, unfortunately, followed up by another three-and-out by the Pokes’ offense, leading to another punt by Ward.

A few plays later, Rangel hit a streaking Brennan Presley for a 41-yard completion, then made the head’s up play of the game for the Pokes up to that point.

“They called my name; I dropped two balls earlier, so I had to make a play and they gave me a chance,” Presley told the Cowboy Radio Network.

On 4th and short, from the Wisconsin one-yard line, Rangel flips the ball to Ollie Gordon, who’s standing on the goal line, while getting sacked, get the Pokes back within 10 points, 24-14, with just under 13 minutes left in the game.

A bit of flipped switch when it comes to third down conversions as the Pokes held the Badgers to 0-for-4 on conversions in the third quarter.

The Pokes picked up their first third down conversion of the game just under the 10-minute mark left in the fourth quarter, a three-yard run for a first down by Jaden Nixon. Rangel completed the second-straight third-down conversion a few plays later with a 41-yard completion to Rashod Owens.

A third-straight conversion came on the next set of downs, a six-yard completion to Presley.

The Cowboys settled for a 24-yard field goal from Tanner Brown, making it a seven-point game, 24-17, with just over five minutes left in the game. After another huge defensive stop by Rawls, this time swatting a pass on third down that most likely would’ve been a long touchdown pass for the Badgers, the Pokes had one final shot.

Rawls finished the game with five total tackles, 1.5 tackles for loss and one sack, and one forced fumble.

Rangel threw a deep ball to a streaking John Paul Richardson, but was unfortunately picked off by Cedrick Dort Jr., who made an impressive play on the ball to seal the deal for the Badgers.

Discussion from...

Oklahoma State Comeback Falls Short as Pokes Lose 24-17 to Wisconsin

3,080 Views | 5 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Osumayor
pokeacola
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Everyone knows. Our O LINE needs work. GR had very little time to get set and throw the ball -defenders were chasing him constantly plus there were few gaps for the RBs to run thru...we all know this, the coaches know this, the AD knows this. Frustrating. But, I trust our coaches to get it fixed
Si
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We were slipping down/ falling all over the place, equipment/shoe guys KNEW this field had been layed with sod just for this game. It didn't appear we made any shoe adjustments at half time to address the situation and it cost us BIG
TUSKAPOKE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I saw some bright spots to build on for next year. IMO Gundy has some tough decisions about some offensive coaches. This has been an issue for several years and involves recruiting and game prep. I go back to previous posts I have made and that is the program has plateaued and needs a thorough review and changes made. Continuing on the current course will yield similar results or worse. GO POKES!!!
PaloDuroPoke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agree with most of these comments. I will say this, goal#1 should be to make sure we keep some of these young studs here. There lots of freshmen and young athletes contributing tonight. Future is bright. The o-line needs to be better but offense is not in sink. We can't run because we are missing wide open receivers and they load the box, we can't pass because we lack experience and have happy feet, our blocking is terrible because there is no cohesiveness and some lack of talent. It all works together. When Rangel hit a couple passes the run game opened up. We also need some different plays. Screens and bombs pretty much sums up our creativity. These are all very fixable issues if allowed to adjust. It's not just the o-line, it's the entire offensive scheme.
Osumayor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Very observant and constructive post PaloDuro!! I was very pleased with some of our young Pokes. Can't wait until next Spring!!
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.