Mike Gundy's Quarterback Room Shaping Up Fine

QB room is not the issue. No QB can function at a high level with the O Lines we've had of late. Need that fixed .

VACowboy said:

---

QB room is not the issue. No QB can function at a high level with the O Lines we've had of late. Need that fixed .

---

Injuries and an associated lack of depth along with a LT that wasn't ready for prime time kept the OL from being improved last year. Those problems appear likely to be answered for '23, although it may involve a completely different answer at LT 1st and 2nd string.

With all due respect, QB is an issue. As in we don't have a top flight QB. Compounded by a bad OL and no run game. Doesn't bode well. A lot of improvement will have to occur. On both sides of the ball.

You don't think Bowman is experienced enough to be successful in Big 12 games?

Vonrocky said:

---

You don't think Bowman is experienced enough to be successful in Big 12 games?

---

I think it's a huge unknown. He hasn't played a meaningful snap in at least 2 years. Without a run game, none of the QB's will be effective.

As usual, I'll believe the offensive line is better when I actually see it produce. We need good health even if we managed to recruit someone that can actually play well there because we've seen what the others produce and consistency is lacking among those guys.

thetruth said:

---

With all due respect, QB is an issue. As in we don't have a top flight QB. Compounded by a bad OL and no run game. Doesn't bode well. A lot of improvement will have to occur. On both sides of the ball.

---

Which QB do you want?

A) 306YPG, 67%, 1.9 TDPG, 1.0 IntPG
B) 233YPG, 62%, 1.6 TDPG, 1.0 IntPG

---

thetruth said:

---

With all due respect, QB is an issue. As in we don't have a top flight QB. Compounded by a bad OL and no run game. Doesn't bode well. A lot of improvement will have to occur. On both sides of the ball.

---

GumbyFromPokeyLand said:

Which QB do you want?

A) 306YPG, 67%, 1.9 TDPG, 1.0 IntPG
B) 233YPG, 62%, 1.6 TDPG, 1.0 IntPG

---

I want the one who played significant snaps last year against P5 competition.

---

---

+ 1 more quotes (click to expand)

thetruth said:

---

With all due respect, QB is an issue. As in we don't have a top flight QB. Compounded by a bad OL and no run game. Doesn't bode well. A lot of improvement will have to occur. On both sides of the ball.

---

GumbyFromPokeyLand said:

Which QB do you want?

A) 306YPG, 67%, 1.9 TDPG, 1.0 IntPG
B) 233YPG, 62%, 1.6 TDPG, 1.0 IntPG

---

thetruth said:

I want the one who played significant snaps last year against P5 competition.

---

That's just a bizarre criteria unless you mean like Hunter Dekkers (ISU) that went 2-8 vs P5 competition? Or Tanner McKee (Stan) that went 2-9 vs P5 competition? Or Ryan Hilinski (NW) that went 1-7 vs P5 completion? Or Grant Wells (VT) that went 1-8 vs P5 completion?

Me thinks you're just randomly searching for reasons to be pessimistic, or simply complain.

---

---

+ 2 more quotes (click to expand)

---

thetruth said:

---

With all due respect, QB is an issue. As in we don't have a top flight QB. Compounded by a bad OL and no run game. Doesn't bode well. A lot of improvement will have to occur. On both sides of the ball.

---

GumbyFromPokeyLand said:

Which QB do you want?

A) 306YPG, 67%, 1.9 TDPG, 1.0 IntPG
B) 233YPG, 62%, 1.6 TDPG, 1.0 IntPG

---

thetruth said:

I want the one who played significant snaps last year against P5 competition.

---

GumbyFromPokeyLand said:

That's just a bizarre criteria unless you mean like Hunter Dekkers (ISU) that went 2-8 vs P5 competition? Or Tanner McKee (Stan) that went 2-9 vs P5 competition? Or Ryan Hilinski (NW) that went 1-7 vs P5 completion? Or Grant Wells (VT) that went 1-8 vs P5 completion?

Me thinks you're just randomly searching for reasons to be pessimistic, or simply complain.

---

Frankly, I don't care what you think. We don't have a proven QB, period.

---

---

+ 3 more quotes (click to expand)

---

---

thetruth said:

---

With all due respect, QB is an issue. As in we don't have a top flight QB. Compounded by a bad OL and no run game. Doesn't bode well. A lot of improvement will have to occur. On both sides of the ball.

---

GumbyFromPokeyLand said:

Which QB do you want?

A) 306YPG, 67%, 1.9 TDPG, 1.0 IntPG
B) 233YPG, 62%, 1.6 TDPG, 1.0 IntPG

---

thetruth said:

I want the one who played significant snaps last year against P5 competition.

---

GumbyFromPokeyLand said:

That's just a bizarre criteria unless you mean like Hunter Dekkers (ISU) that went 2-8 vs P5 competition? Or Tanner McKee (Stan) that went 2-9 vs P5 competition? Or Ryan Hilinski (NW) that went 1-7 vs P5 completion? Or Grant Wells (VT) that went 1-8 vs P5 completion?

Me thinks you're just randomly searching for reasons to be pessimistic, or simply complain.

---

thetruth said:

Frankly, I don't care what you think. We don't have a proven QB, period.

---

We just have a veteran QB with 17 complete games, 5 spring camps, 6 fall camps and better per game stats than our starting QB the last 4 years. But alas, you can find a reason to complain. Makes sense. SMH.

OT said:

---

LOL. Gumby suffering from "shiny new guy" syndrome.

Maybe Bowman wins the job, maybe he doesn't.

---

Who other than Bowman will get enough snaps to show enough to win the job?

---

OT said:

---

LOL. Gumby suffering from "shiny new guy" syndrome.

Maybe Bowman wins the job, maybe he doesn't.

---

GumbyFromPokeyLand said:

Who other than Bowman will get enough snaps to show enough to win the job?

---

I keep telling you Gumby, no using logic around here, it's not allowed! We haven't even gone through the Spring Practice workouts and yet people KNOW who will be good and who won't! ROTHFLMAO!