Story Poster
Photo by Mark J. Rebilas-USA TODAY Sports

Weiberg Tells Tulsa World Most Important in Colorado's Move is the Message

July 29, 2023
3,509

STILLWATER – Some of Oklahoma State’s most memorable moments in athletics have involved Colorado. In the Big Eight Conference opener in 1972 under new head coach Dave Smith the Cowboys fresh off a narrow loss at Arkansas 24-23 were home in Lewis Field facing No. 3 Colorado. Those Cowboys shocked the world with a 31-6 win over the highly-regarded Buffaloes. Colorado was led by John Stearnes, who went on to big league baseball career primarily with the New York Mets and Cullen Bryant, a running back that spent 13-years in the NFL with the Rams and the Seahawks.

Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports
Rudolph throws for a score in the Alamo Bowl.

It was a very impressive win under Smith, who left for SMU after that season leading Jim Stanley to become OSU’s head coach. 

As a Pac-12 member and after one of their two winning seasons in that conference, Oklahoma State shined in the Alamo Bowl in 2016 beating up the Buffs 38-8 behind three passing touchdowns and 314-yards passing by MVP Mason Rudolph. 

The most tragic of events in Oklahoma State athletics came on Jan. 27, 2001 when the third plance carrying the Oklahoma State team and travel party home from a game at Colorado crashed in the flatirons of Colorado east of Denver and killed all 10 men aboard including Oklahoma State student assistant Jared Weiberg, the brother of Oklahoma State athletic director Chad Weiberg. 

Oklahoma State has that and many attachments to Colorado having shared 53-years of previous membership in the same conference with the Buffaloes. 

The attachment with Colorado returning to the Big 12 according to Weiberg in his comments to Oklahoma State beat reporter for The Tulsa World Dean Ruhl.

“I think the best thing about it is what it says about our league and where we are,” Weiberg continued. “For Colorado to make this decision, to rejoin with us, says a lot of positive things about the direction we’re going.”

© BRYAN TERRY/THE OKLAHOMAN / USA TODAY NETWORK
Weiberg visits with Big 12 Commissioner Brett Yormark.

Weiberg acknolwedged the Big 12 has been through so much the last two-years since Texas and Oklahoma announced their joint departure to the SEC. The league has added four new schools coming on board this season, changed commissioners to a an agressive and forward thinking Brett Yormark, and now added the return of Colorado and perhaps more schools to follow possibly out of the Pac-12.

“Each step is meant to help ensure the upcoming 10-15 years, so that we know we’ve done everything we can to be in the best position we can be in for whatever the landscape of college athletics looks like,” Weiberg concluded.

 

 

Discussion from...

Weiberg Tells Tulsa World Most Important in Colorado's Move is the Message

2,651 Views | 10 Replies | Last: 9 mo ago by Duke Silver
RodeoPoke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm less and less impressed with Weiberg every time he opens his mouth.

aggie1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Are we supposed to care what you think?
Orangeheart72
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So far so good with Weiberg to me. I'm hearing our coaches like him, his hire for women's basketball seems like a home run, he's going to have some tough decisions in one or perhaps two men's sports if things don't shape up better however. That will be his moment to shine or falter IMO. Better yet, things turn out well without testing the A.D.
OSUCWBY
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Josh has to make tough decision and if he doesn't make it then Weiberg has a tough decision to make.
RodeoPoke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggie1 said:

Are we supposed to care what you think?
are "we" supposed to care that you just made this post? Behave yourself, this board has been civil for a while now. There is no need for nasty comments like you just made about others.

If you think that our AD is walking on water, then just say that. Thank you.
Pistolp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I go more by what I see done rather than what is said, and based on what he has done so far Weiberg gets maybe an A, no worse than a solid B. He didn't try to do too much and "reinvent the wheel" early. He seems to have united the coaches, and he has communicated his longer-term plans. If he can get the plans executed, then definitely an A.
aggie1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You are the one making the negative comments about the AD for no reason. He hasn't even been in the job that long. Nobody cares what you think.
The reason for my comment is that you are not qualified to make a judgement on AD performance, don't have the knowledge, don't know what the job entails, don't have direct interaction with his bosses, etc, etc.
Only those people can make that analysis, not a big sissy like you that can't take a negative comment but you sure can put them out.
RodeoPoke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggie1 said:

You are the one making the negative comments about the AD for no reason. He hasn't even been in the job that long. Nobody cares what you think.
The reason for my comment is that you are not qualified to make a judgement on AD performance, don't have the knowledge, don't know what the job entails, don't have direct interaction with his bosses, etc, etc.
Only those people can make that analysis, not a big sissy like you that can't take a negative comment but you sure can put them out.
and likewise, you are not qualified to make a judgement on me. When did negative comments become off limits? You're the new board king?

I am allowed to express my opinion on our program whether you like them or not; however it is actually prohibited to to attack other posters.

and who authorized you to speak for everybody else? Answer, you are not authorized to state what others think.

please learn how to play nice

thanks
Duke Silver
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggie1 said:

You are the one making the negative comments about the AD for no reason. He hasn't even been in the job that long. Nobody cares what you think.
The reason for my comment is that you are not qualified to make a judgement on AD performance, don't have the knowledge, don't know what the job entails, don't have direct interaction with his bosses, etc, etc.
Only those people can make that analysis, not a big sissy like you that can't take a negative comment but you sure can put them out.
You are going on ignore now buddy boy.
Duke Silver
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RodeoPoke said:

aggie1 said:

You are the one making the negative comments about the AD for no reason. He hasn't even been in the job that long. Nobody cares what you think.
The reason for my comment is that you are not qualified to make a judgement on AD performance, don't have the knowledge, don't know what the job entails, don't have direct interaction with his bosses, etc, etc.
Only those people can make that analysis, not a big sissy like you that can't take a negative comment but you sure can put them out.
and likewise, you are not qualified to make a judgement on me. When did negative comments become off limits? You're the new board king?

I am allowed to express my opinion on our program whether you like them or not; however it is actually prohibited to to attack other posters.

and who authorized you to speak for everybody else? Answer, you are not authorized to state what others think.

please learn how to play nice

thanks
Better make a new profile.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.