Odds on Candidates to be the Next Head Football Coach at Oklahoma State

We took a long look for Oklahoma State coaching candidates from the favorites to some extreme longshots.

By Robert Allen

October 14, 2025

7.4k Views

3 Comments

JPat

Joined: Jul 25, 2021

Posts: 116

User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring

How long do you want to ignore this user?

24 hours One week Permanently Cancel

6:48p, 10/14/25

Any of you subscribers care to clue the rest of us in on the list?

RodeoPoke

Joined: Feb 12, 2023

Posts: 1,848

User Profile

Private Message

Ignore User Stop Ignoring

How long do you want to ignore this user?

24 hours One week Permanently Cancel

In reply to JPat • 7:36a, 10/15/25

JPat said:
Any of you subscribers care to clue the rest of us in on the list?

it's not worth the effort...

the list includes literally dozens of names and practically everybody that ever said "HC" out loud.

It's broken into 3 categories of "likelihood", but provides no rationale as to why folks are in a particular category except Robert thought so.

the article has all the markings of AI generated..... sadly, Robert probably spent quite a lot of time on the list.

RA doesn't even indicate who he thinks the top 3-5 may be. He has 5 guys listed in the 3-1 to 10-1 category, then he lists them alphabetically, and it's the same guys he's already mentioned S.Fl, N.Tx from his article, plus Monken and Robinson the most often mentioned on fan dream lists.

That's all I got out of it anyway.

That the search is an open crap shoot.

3 edits

PokeSmot75

Joined: Jan 8, 2023

Posts: 160

User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring

How long do you want to ignore this user?

24 hours One week Permanently Cancel

In reply to RodeoPoke • 8:00p, 10/15/25

RodeoPoke said:
JPat said:
Any of you subscribers care to clue the rest of us in on the list?

it's not worth the effort...

the list includes literally dozens of names and practically everybody that ever said "HC" out loud.

It's broken into 3 categories of "likelihood", but provides no rationale as to why folks are in a particular category except Robert thought so.

the article has all the markings of AI generated..... sadly, Robert probably spent quite a lot of time on the list.

RA doesn't even indicate who he thinks the top 3-5 may be. He has 5 guys listed in the 3-1 to 10-1 category, then he lists them alphabetically, and it's the same guys he's already mentioned S.Fl, N.Tx from his article, plus Monken and Robinson the most often mentioned on fan dream lists.

That's all I got out of it anyway.

That the search is an open crap shoot.

Usually I'm not your biggest fan, but I very much liked this reply. Cheers, amigo.

2 edits