Story Poster
Photo by Pat Kinnison - Chief Photographer
Oklahoma State Football

Cowboys Simply Need To Put On Their Best Face and Push Relevance and Resume

August 26, 2021
15,491

STILLWATER – A couple of weeks ago Oklahoma State head football coach Mike Gundy was asked with the opening question of his scheduled media opp by Berry Tramel of The Oklahoman if there is more pressure for his team to be better because of conference realignment issues? Gundy, like the savvy and veteran football coach that he is, didn’t hesitate and proceeded to take any pressure of playing for the school’s athletic future off the backs of his current team.

To continue reading, you must be a Pokes Report Premium subscriber.
Discussion from...

Cowboys Simply Need To Put On Their Best Face and Push Relevance and Resume

14,865 Views | 52 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by GumbyFromPokeyLand
CaliforniaCowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
season ticket sales must be pretty bad.... they haven't said much about it. (especially being a goon homegame year)

bad sales likely due to COVID still lurking about this Fall.

just at the time when we need more sales, not less. Hopefully the China virus will be over by mid-December and lots of folks will show up for the Texas Bowl, to show our support!!

tulsasig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Our best strategy is to put our heads down and win games. Fans need to fill the stadium. Conference realignment is not happening anytime soon. I say we stick with the Big 12 as is until 2025. If OU and Texas want out early, make them pay the maximum exit fee (we'll need the money to help cover our revenue shortfall). After that, we can explore expanding the Big XII or moving to another conference. I see no reason for us to be in a hurry. We need to take time to develop a strategy to maximize our TV and streaming revenue, and get somebody besides ESPN to bid on our media package. I say let's win our way to the conference championship game, and after that, who knows! Go Pokes!
CaliforniaCowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
if ever there was a time that OSU needed a magical season, this is it...

I'll take pizza bets that the goon/horn limbo won't drag out until the end of our GoR agreement.

Orangeheart72
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I personally would like to see the remaining 8 schools at least try to add Cincinnati, Houston, UCF and Colorado State to get back to 12 teams in our conference. And perhaps bring along Memphis and USF and get to 14 and have a better division set up. We won't have the disadvantages of having $200 million athletic programs in our conference or on our schedule to feed off the rest of the conference. No one or two teams will have the ability to blackmail the conference selfishly or threaten to leave and make it "insignificant". So be it. The rich bluebloods can play with each other, someone who has equal resources and might beat them! Oh well! Let's move on.
CaliforniaCowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Orangeheart72 said:

I personally would like to see the remaining 8 schools at least try to add Cincinnati, Houston, UCF and Colorado State to get back to 12 teams in our conference. And perhaps bring along Memphis and USF and get to 14 and have a better division set up. We won't have the disadvantages of having $200 million athletic programs in our conference or on our schedule to feed off the rest of the conference. No one or two teams will have the ability to blackmail the conference selfishly or threaten to leave and make it "insignificant". So be it. The rich bluebloods can play with each other, someone who has equal resources and might beat them! Oh well! Let's move on.
Agreed.

I'm not to sold on Colorado State though... seems like there could be better choices (but it could add the Denver market) BYU? Boise? or teams that are at least ranked once in a while and aren't located in a frozen wasteland.

GumbyFromPokeyLand
How long do you want to ignore this user?

No, no, no! Do not add teams! Worst idea ever. No way we ever get to one of the other power conferences if the B12 adds teams now and then has to negotiate a new media contract. On the heels of the OU/UT fiasco, every school would surely have to agree to terms that would be economically prohibitive to ever get out of the conference.

Unless there's an acceptable landing spot for at least 8 of 10 teams, nobody will be able to leave before 2025 anyway. The other conferences know this and are in no hurry to offer admittance only to be told nobody can move till 2025. There's no upside for them to offer now. They will want to wait and see how their own new media deals shake out, and maybe even a new CFP format.

OSU will play out the current media contract, all the while staying in contact with the other conferences, and be available when either the B1G or PAC or SEC is ready to make a move - it will come. There's very little downside and huge potential upside if we can just BE PATIENT.
CaliforniaCowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
worst idea ever is probably joining the Pac12 - under any circumstance.

regardless.... like I said....

I'll take pizza bets that the goon/horn limbo won't drag out until the end of our GoR agreement.
NJAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GumbyFromPokeyLand said:


No, no, no! Do not add teams! Worst idea ever. No way we ever get to one of the other power conferences if the B12 adds teams now and then has to negotiate a new media contract. On the heels of the OU/UT fiasco, every school would surely have to agree to terms that would be economically prohibitive to ever get out of the conference.

Unless there's an acceptable landing spot for at least 8 of 10 teams, nobody will be able to leave before 2025 anyway. The other conferences know this and are in no hurry to offer admittance only to be told nobody can move till 2025. There's no upside for them to offer now. They will want to wait and see how their own new media deals shake out, and maybe even a new CFP format.

OSU will play out the current media contract, all the while staying in contact with the other conferences, and be available when either the B1G or PAC or SEC is ready to make a move - it will come. There's very little downside and huge potential upside if we can just BE PATIENT.
And be left holding the bag in 4 years.

Waiting on others to expand is the most ignorant put your head in the sand plan we or any of the other schools could put in play.

Luckily the expansion committee is moving and ready to start considering schools now. Hocutt met with the Presidents this morning, and will meet with the AD's live next week. Oliver Luck has been hired to work with them on expansion plans and media contracts.

The league has no time to wait. It takes a long time to complete these negotiations and we may need teams as early as 2023, and we need a lineup to go to market with by 2024. Now maybe they don't start playing until 2025, but you have to have the lineup in place to negotiate. 10 or 12 looks like the best number as going beyond that its hard to find enough value to not lose money.

We have several things going for us to stay together, and very little to encourage us the expansion offers would help any of the schools.

First we have position as an autonomous conference with access to the playoffs. The Alliance is screaming that they don't want that to go away. We can also bring that into our negotiations with the SEC to let the little 2 out of the GoR. So it would look like the conference will have a playoff berth, and based on the B1G/PAC statements on this we are probably getting an 8 team playoff that pits those two conferences together in the Rose Bowl, and would see the SEC/ACC/Big XII champs hosting at large teams in other NYD bowls. Getting a B1G/PAC Rose Bowl at 5pm pt on NYD is like goal #1 for the Alliance.

We can negotiate early GoR exit for the little 2 and get a scheduling agreement with the SEC. Say 16 games a year so we have 8 games to sell in our package, and we'll be picking up 8 checks at the better SEC per game rate.

Those things add value, and Bowlsby's worst estimate was a drop to $26M so getting into the 30's can be done if we're aggressive and make good moves. If we sit on our hands $26M might be tough to get.

Expansion of the other P5 conferences needs to be forgotten. The Alliance is standing against that. No one but ESPN and some sports writers ever wanted the 4x16 set up that too many people keep looking to happen. None of the Alliance conferences have a need or desire to expand. So we just need to focus on building the Big XII.
GumbyFromPokeyLand
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No way we enter 2025 tied to a B12 GOR.

You're like 95% of all fans. You believe when a conference indicates it doesn't want to expand this very minute, it means never.

Expanding now means you're condemning your entire future for tv money that's 30-50% (at best) of the poorest P4 conference. Which is no better off than if you don't expand in the next 4 years.
CaliforniaCowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GumbyFromPokeyLand said:

No way we enter 2025 tied to a B12 GOR.

You're like 95% of all fans. You believe when a conference indicates it doesn't want to expand this very minute, it means never.

Expanding now means you're condemning your entire future for tv money that's 30-50% (at best) of the poorest P4 conference. Which is no better off than if you don't expand in the next 4 years.
only you have zero proof of any claim that you make.

no proof... no crystal ball... every egg in the same flimsy basket.

The situation is to investigate now (not sign now), and have options available to weigh against any possible lame handouts from the power-grab 4

There is no deal, until there is a deal.... but there is never any harm in discussing what the various deals might consist of.

GumbyFromPokeyLand
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Did I say don't listen? Don't investigate? Don't have options?

We need to be ready when the call comes. And it will come.
NJAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GumbyFromPokeyLand said:

No way we enter 2025 tied to a B12 GOR.

You're like 95% of all fans. You believe when a conference indicates it doesn't want to expand this very minute, it means never.

Expanding now means you're condemning your entire future for tv money that's 30-50% (at best) of the poorest P4 conference. Which is no better off than if you don't expand in the next 4 years.
I haven't seen one thing that makes me thing any of the conferences want to expand, and just listening to Max Olsen and he just said going forward no one but OU type schools will be expansion targets for the other 4 conferences.

We've got to build our resume if we want out, and that means keep the league whole, make it better, make the playoffs and win some playoff games or championships.

Sitting on our hands and hoping is what KU is doing we need to be better than that.

IF in 4 years we get an offer well you know what then we can pay the exit fees and negotiate our GoR release. Destroying our best known option in case that slim thing happens is not a plan that says good option.
GumbyFromPokeyLand
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aren't you the one that said the loss of OU/UT was only a 33% loss of eyes, and therefore media value? With 20% less teams and only a 33% reduction in value, I thought you'd be the first to say don't add. Or do you really know what you think?
CaliforniaCowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GumbyFromPokeyLand said:

Aren't you the one that said the loss of OU/UT was only a 33% loss of eyes, and therefore media value? With 20% less teams and only a 33% reduction in value, I thought you'd be the first to say don't add. Or do you really know what you think?
you still don't get that math thingy.

lets see... half of 33% is around 16% (OU)

1/8 of 66% is what 8% (OSU)

the point is how to raise our value another 8% in a year's time
NJAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You need to expand to have enough inventory to bury the KU junk and have games to put on the networks. 10 accomplishes that 12 with 2 teams in the MTN Tz is better. Depending on the network(s) talking to us 16 might be the number though I doubt it. But 12 gives you a good schedule 8 conf/4 ooc games, and ensures you'll have a reasonable CCG match-up.

Adding teams also gives you more chances to have desirable games between ranked opponents fighting for the league title.

ESPN got UT to hamstring the league at 10 to keep us fragile so they could pull the no value move to switch the little two where they wanted them. No need to listen to ESPN's bad advice anymore.
GumbyFromPokeyLand
How long do you want to ignore this user?
For you expansion nuts.


How does OSU support ANY definitive move without first satisfactorily answering the following questions:

What opportunity (adding teams, or other) would be reasonably available now for the B12 that would not be reasonably available in 3 years?

How does the B12 add teams before 2025 and keep OU/UT in the conference and collect full (highest possible) media value until 2025?

Does adding teams to the B12 before 2025 potentially hinder the conference's ability to collect GOR$ from OU/UT?

How does the B12 make meaningfully more money per school over the next 3-4 years than its currently projected to make if OU/UT leave early?

How could OSU announce its leaving the B12 while also supporting its B12 partners desire to extract every penny out of OU/UT without damaging OSUs own cause or the B12s pending legal fight with OU/UT?

What benefit is there for another P4 conference to announce now that they plan to expand with selected B12 teams in 2025?

What is the tangible benefit for a B12 team to announce now that they plan to leave in 2025?

What's the path for any B12 team to leave before 2025 without a HUGE penalty?

What's the path for any B12 team to leave after 2024 without a huge penalty if the B12 expands before 2025?

How would a B12 team announce now they plan to leave in 2025 without pissing off the rest of the conference?

If OSU (or other school) hopes/plans to leave in 2025, why not first sit back let OU/UT blaze the very unpleasant exit trail while secretly looking for the right opportunity to announce and/or negotiate it's own exit?

Who wants to play in the B12 for 4 years with the rest of the league pissed off at you?
CaliforniaCowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
frankly, those ARE NOT the right questions, and they clearly are not the FIRST questions to answer.

All of this was already explained to you... all of it.

IN THREE YEARS WE NEED TO KNOW THE OPTIONS, NOT WAIT THREE YEARS TO START INVESTIGATING OPTIONS.

This stuff is simple... it really is. There are a lot of unknown variables as of yet, but the process is simple.

GumbyFromPokeyLand
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CaliforniaCowboy said:

frankly, those ARE NOT the right questions, and they clearly are not the FIRST questions to answer.

All of this was already explained to you... all of it.

IN THREE YEARS WE NEED TO KNOW THE OPTIONS, NOT WAIT THREE YEARS TO START INVESTIGATING OPTIONS.

This stuff is simple... it really is. There are a lot of unknown variables as of yet, but the process is simple.



As if you would dare post the "right first questions".


Nonetheless, Apoarently you agree. Expanding before 2025 would not be wise, certainly not necessary.

Because that's the conclusion you would reach if you took time to analyze and answer the above questions.
CaliforniaCowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GumbyFromPokeyLand said:



As if you would dare post the "right first questions".


Nonetheless, Apoarently you agree. Expanding before 2025 would not be wise, certainly not necessary.

Because that's the conclusion you would reach if you took time to analyze and answer the above questions.
actually no.... you made all of that up.

I have not seen anybody on this forum say that we need to expand the conference before the end of the GoR.

YOU are accusing everybody of taking that position, but I have not heard anybody make that statement.

It's you. You're accusing everybody of things.

Try to listen, and understand and participate in the discussion. We get your point. We need to make sure that there isn't some killer offer out there for OSU, and we don't need to be bound to some new contract if we're expecting to join another conf. Everybody gets that. Everybody agrees. You're arguing something that is not even the position of others, apparently just for the sake of arguing.

All that I've heard from folks posting in this forum is to not wait until Weiberg says in 2024... "oh crap, it looks like we're out of invite options, quick, quick how do we slap together an immediate expansion and sign a killer TV deal over the weekend".

How will you know if taking a spot in the Pac12 for XXX dollars is a good deal or not, unless you have some other option framed out, like 14-team Big12 with professional valuation?

Are you opposed to TTech leading an effort to collect information about a Big12 expansion option?

NJAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Absolutely Cali.

Every school that would come would need at a minimum 2 years to notify their conference and get out. Even BYU will need a few years to work out all the game contracts they have being an independent.

CBS & NBC both have new streaming services and nether has a major football conference under contract after 2025. Someone like that might pay a decent bonus to sign a good all sports league for content alone. That's what got the Big XII the big FOX deal when it was made, they needed content to launch FS1.

FOX likes our product and could still be interested in a part of the rights. Heck don't even count out ESPN, their lack of desire and dismissive talking points were probably more about covering their move of OU/UT to the SEC.

But you have to work and find these things out and make contact and agreements you can't sit and hope somebody somewhere is going to do something really nice for you.

Frankly I'd rather stay in the Big XII and beat these other 7 than go to another conference. I've barely learned to love beating some of these schools I don't really want to start over. I also think being free of the clouds of OU & UT always hanging over everything and generally ruining it for us all is a great relief so running off to a conference where they or some other media darling bully does that for us doesn't thrill me.

As for why I don't see expansion happening. The current round is about media darlings and we aren't one. the 4 x 16 structure was a Sports Writers dream, and was never a goal of any of the conferences except maybe ESPN's tool the SEC.

And in the end doing a good job of making a path forward will not stop us from leaving if we get a better offer.
GumbyFromPokeyLand
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who said this? Sounds like someone touting expansion. Not a word about waiting until 2025.

"Agreed. (Agreeing with a plea to expand)

I'm not to sold on Colorado State though... seems like there could be better choices (but it could add the Denver market) BYU? Boise? or teams that are at least ranked once in a while and aren't located in a frozen wasteland."

And who said this? Also sounds like someone touting expansion as soon as possible.

"And be left holding the bag in 4 years.

Waiting on others to expand is the most ignorant put your head in the sand plan we or any of the other schools could put in play.

Luckily the expansion committee is moving and ready to start considering schools now. Hocutt met with the Presidents this morning, and will meet with the AD's live next week. Oliver Luck has been hired to work with them on expansion plans and media contracts.

The league has no time to wait. It takes a long time to complete these negotiations and we may need teams as early as 2023, and we need a lineup to go to market with by 2024. Now maybe they don't start playing until 2025, but you have to have the lineup in place to negotiate. 10 or 12 looks like the best number as going beyond that its hard to find enough value to not lose money"

I see little about exploring any option but expansion. Certainly the underlying theme is to invite new teams well before 2023.
GumbyFromPokeyLand
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There's also this to which I was responding.

" I personally would like to see the remaining 8 schools at least try to add Cincinnati, Houston, UCF and Colorado State to get back to 12 teams in our conference. And perhaps bring along Memphis and USF and get to 14 and have a better division set up. We won't have the disadvantages of having $200 million athletic programs in our conference or on our schedule to feed off the rest of the conference. No one or two teams will have the ability to blackmail the conference selfishly or threaten to leave and make it "insignificant". So be it. The rich bluebloods can play with each other, someone who has equal resources and might beat them! Oh well! Let's move on."

Nobody calling for expansion?
NJAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GumbyFromPokeyLand said:

There's also this to which I was responding.

" I personally would like to see the remaining 8 schools at least try to add Cincinnati, Houston, UCF and Colorado State to get back to 12 teams in our conference. And perhaps bring along Memphis and USF and get to 14 and have a better division set up. We won't have the disadvantages of having $200 million athletic programs in our conference or on our schedule to feed off the rest of the conference. No one or two teams will have the ability to blackmail the conference selfishly or threaten to leave and make it "insignificant". So be it. The rich bluebloods can play with each other, someone who has equal resources and might beat them! Oh well! Let's move on."

Nobody calling for expansion?
No one said we weren't calling for expansion. We must expand, no one is getting an offer to go elsewhere, or it will be so far down the road its too late to save the conference. We have to start doing the work on it now because as OU / UT & the SEC were working on them announcing in a year or two and it was pushed forward by the aTm leak. It takes 2-4 years to negotiate notify and exit. And we better have someone like BYU ready to go immediately because as soon as OU/UT leave we need a ninth team or we're in a world of hurt. We can all grab up one more FCS school to get our schedule filled out for the next 2 to 3 years, but it would be tough to have to get 2 more games. And it would give ESPN a good cause reason to cut or drop the contract. We have to provide FBS games.

But that's alright lets stick our heads in the sand and in 2025 once the contracts gone try to find teams and negotiate a new contract. But, don't worry the AAC and MWC would probably take us. It just depends on if we want to be in the same conference with Tulsa or Wyoming?
GumbyFromPokeyLand
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NJAggie said:

GumbyFromPokeyLand said:

There's also this to which I was responding.

" I personally would like to see the remaining 8 schools at least try to add Cincinnati, Houston, UCF and Colorado State to get back to 12 teams in our conference. And perhaps bring along Memphis and USF and get to 14 and have a better division set up. We won't have the disadvantages of having $200 million athletic programs in our conference or on our schedule to feed off the rest of the conference. No one or two teams will have the ability to blackmail the conference selfishly or threaten to leave and make it "insignificant". So be it. The rich bluebloods can play with each other, someone who has equal resources and might beat them! Oh well! Let's move on."

Nobody calling for expansion?
No one said we weren't calling for expansion. We must expand, no one is getting an offer to go elsewhere, or it will be so far down the road its too late to save the conference. We have to start doing the work on it now because as OU / UT & the SEC were working on them announcing in a year or two and it was pushed forward by the aTm leak. It takes 2-4 years to negotiate notify and exit. And we better have someone like BYU ready to go immediately because as soon as OU/UT leave we need a ninth team or we're in a world of hurt. We can all grab up one more FCS school to get our schedule filled out for the next 2 to 3 years, but it would be tough to have to get 2 more games. And it would give ESPN a good cause reason to cut or drop the contract. We have to provide FBS games.

But that's alright lets stick our heads in the sand and in 2025 once the contracts gone try to find teams and negotiate a new contract. But, don't worry the AAC and MWC would probably take us. It just depends on if we want to be in the same conference with Tulsa or Wyoming?


The B12 could easily expand (invite new teams) with little negotiation. OU and UT took months because of the GOR, exit fees, SEC waiting on ESPN, the proposed new CFP format and the LHN. We won't have those obstacles. Sure, we engage in ongoing research of the available teams and consult with media providers to determine optimal value. But OSU should not approve any invites until it's clear we're not going elsewhere. Clearly we'll stay in contact with the other leagues as they negotiate new media deals and as the landscape continues to evolve. But I fully expect OSU (and maybe others) to be an impediment for the B12 to expand.
GumbyFromPokeyLand
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another important point. The B12 should not expand before the expiration of the current media deal, even if OU/UT leave before it expires. The GOR was designed to compensate the league for the loss of a team and its media value. Expanding would be an effort to mitigate our losses, thus potentially hindering our ability to collect from OU/UT.
AustinCowboy88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Great questions Gumby!

On the revenue generation side of the equation, questions 2,3 and 4 seem most critical. Capture as much dry powered as possible given the unknown.

The complexity of layers involved here, current networks, potential new providers wanting in, NCAA as a ruling body status, existing conferences, individual teams, amateur athletics, etc hard to factor all these and what might happen.
NJAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GumbyFromPokeyLand said:

Another important point. The B12 should not expand before the expiration of the current media deal, even if OU/UT leave before it expires. The GOR was designed to compensate the league for the loss of a team and its media value. Expanding would be an effort to mitigate our losses, thus potentially hindering our ability to collect from OU/UT.
Expanding would have no effect on OU or UT. OU & UT are bound by the GoR, they are not receiving any TV money from the Big XII until the exit fee is paid. Not to mention a settlement for the damage their ESPN contrived actions caused. Whether they leave tonight or in 2025.

If they leave before 2025 without negotiating a return of their GoR's then they cannot broadcast their games anywhere except through the Big XII package, and are not going to receive any of the money for it.

OH, and guess what all of the schools we will be negotiating with that are in conferences have GoR's and exit fees they will need to deal with. Also most of them require 18 months of notice. So yes we do have to start soon.

And if OU/UT pay the fee and want out in 2023 we might be better off letting them go, and being ready to bring in 2 new schools. Because we can't simply stay at 8 because we'd all be down 2 games and who would we get to come in on a moments notice. And negotiating their exit may be one of the most lucrative things the league can do. Say scheduling agreements with the SEC and an extension of the Sugar Bowl deal.

I get it you don't like change, but its coming. Managing it is the smart thing. Trying to ignore it and hope Sanata Claus bails you out is not a viable strategy.
GumbyFromPokeyLand
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NJAggie said:

GumbyFromPokeyLand said:

Another important point. The B12 should not expand before the expiration of the current media deal, even if OU/UT leave before it expires. The GOR was designed to compensate the league for the loss of a team and its media value. Expanding would be an effort to mitigate our losses, thus potentially hindering our ability to collect from OU/UT.
Expanding would have no effect on OU or UT. OU & UT are bound by the GoR, they are not receiving any TV money from the Big XII until the exit fee is paid. Not to mention a settlement for the damage their ESPN contrived actions caused. Whether they leave tonight or in 2025.

If they leave before 2025 without negotiating a return of their GoR's then they cannot broadcast their games anywhere except through the Big XII package, and are not going to receive any of the money for it.

OH, and guess what all of the schools we will be negotiating with that are in conferences have GoR's and exit fees they will need to deal with. Also most of them require 18 months of notice. So yes we do have to start soon.

And if OU/UT pay the fee and want out in 2023 we might be better off letting them go, and being ready to bring in 2 new schools. Because we can't simply stay at 8 because we'd all be down 2 games and who would we get to come in on a moments notice. And negotiating their exit may be one of the most lucrative things the league can do. Say scheduling agreements with the SEC and an extension of the Sugar Bowl deal.

I get it you don't like change, but its coming. Managing it is the smart thing. Trying to ignore it and hope Sanata Claus bails you out is not a viable strategy.


You're missing a legal concept. If the B12 expands before the end of the current media deal, OU/UT WILL argue that the B12 mitigated the loss of media value by adding teams. The GOR provision is a "value" protection for the league against loss of value by teams leaving during the term of the contract. Now, that argument may not hold up under protracted litigation, but it will likely lead to settlement talks. Thus the reason not to put the GOR provision at risk by adding teams.
GumbyFromPokeyLand
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oh, I forgot. Only 6 of the 8 remaining schools have expressed interest in expansion. 2 of the 8 have indicated no interest/hesitant/reluctant/opposed to expansion. Those 2 are Kansas and .Oklahoma State.
Pistolp
How long do you want to ignore this user?

I haven't read the GOR agreement, and I'm guessing noone else has either. BUT -

I don't think the "mitigation of loss" idea would probably carry any water legally. My understanding is the Big XII owns the TV rights for all teams including OU and TX through 2025. Period. It is not a matter of "covering lost revenue"; the conference just owns them if remaining teams are harmed or not.

If the conference were to improve it's other income by expansion, I don't think it would have any bearing on the GOR unless it had some clause which references "lost revenue to remaining teams" in the GOR, which I just can't imagine it would. If it does, they need some new attorneys to right up agreements for them. You should never limit the justification for owning the rights like that.
CaliforniaCowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
good lord Gumby...you're just trying to fight with everybody.

Nobody SAID THOSE THINGS.... IN YOUR OWN WORDS.


you said, "It SOUNDS like epanion TO ME".

but, like has been explained over and over to you... .it is DISCUSSION ABOUT expanding. About, not waiting until the last minute to collect data.

I was very, very, very clear in my last post, and yet you insist on trying to make this thread about what YOU THINK other people are saying, IN YOUR OPINION - as you yourself said.

these endless and mindless threads that you create by making up stuff you think other people are saying need to end.

Please let's talk about what people actually did say (not your interpretations), or talk about potential hypothetical scenarios, which is what everybody else on here is doing.

you are doing nothing more than trolling the posters on this board.
GumbyFromPokeyLand
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CaliforniaCowboy said:

Orangeheart72 said:

I personally would like to see the remaining 8 schools at least try to add Cincinnati, Houston, UCF and Colorado State to get back to 12 teams in our conference. And perhaps bring along Memphis and USF and get to 14 and have a better division set up. We won't have the disadvantages of having $200 million athletic programs in our conference or on our schedule to feed off the rest of the conference. No one or two teams will have the ability to blackmail the conference selfishly or threaten to leave and make it "insignificant". So be it. The rich bluebloods can play with each other, someone who has equal resources and might beat them! Oh well! Let's move on.
Agreed.

I'm not to sold on Colorado State though... seems like there could be better choices (but it could add the Denver market) BYU? Boise? or teams that are at least ranked once in a while and aren't located in a frozen wasteland.




You agreed with expansion. Nothing about waiting. Nothing about exploring options. Nothing about the expiration of the GOR. Nothing about being ready if we do get asked by a P4. Just to heck with the PAC, let's expand.

This is the EXACT attitude and precise post which caused me to post:

"No, no, no. Worst idea ever (and so on)"

Own it, dude.
CaliforniaCowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GumbyFromPokeyLand said:





You agreed with expansion. Nothing about waiting. Nothing about exploring options. Nothing about the expiration of the GOR. Nothing about being ready if we do get asked by a P4. Just to heck with the PAC, let's expand.

This is the EXACT attitude and precise post which caused me to post:

"No,no, no"

Own it, dude.
yes, I do think that expansion is likely our best option (regardless of all other options... BUT IT DID QUALIFY IT WITH - depending on whether a 12-team playoff is created with the B12 getting an AUTOMATIC birth.

that's a big, big, if.... we have to WAIT for those types of decisions.. . why did you leave that out of your troll re-write?

actually read what is written by other, and stop trolling
GumbyFromPokeyLand
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CaliforniaCowboy said:

GumbyFromPokeyLand said:





You agreed with expansion. Nothing about waiting. Nothing about exploring options. Nothing about the expiration of the GOR. Nothing about being ready if we do get asked by a P4. Just to heck with the PAC, let's expand.

This is the EXACT attitude and precise post which caused me to post:

"No,no, no"

Own it, dude.
yes, I do think that expansion is likely our best option (regardless of all other options... BUT IT DID QUALIFY IT WITH - depending on whether a 12-team playoff is created with the B12 getting an AUTOMATIC birth.

that's a big, big, if.... we have to WAIT for those types of decisions.. . why did you leave that out of your troll re-write?

actually read what is written by other, and stop trolling


Now who is making stuff up? You're waiting to see if the B12 gets an automatic bid in a 12team playoff? Who said that? I don't see it anywhere in your ramblings. Please point me to that post.

BTW, the 12-team CFP proposal does not contain automatic bids for specific conferences. It's the 6 highest ranked conference champions that get an automatic bid.
GumbyFromPokeyLand
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AustinCowboy88 said:

Great questions Gumby!

On the revenue generation side of the equation, questions 2,3 and 4 seem most critical. Capture as much dry powered as possible given the unknown.

The complexity of layers involved here, current networks, potential new providers wanting in, NCAA as a ruling body status, existing conferences, individual teams, amateur athletics, etc hard to factor all these and what might happen.


Figuring out the "value" thingy could get tricky. ESPN would like to shed itself of a good portion of their B12 deal by having OU/UT leave early. Further, they'd like OU/UT in the SEC by 2024 when the SEC/ESPN deal kicks in. Getting a good read out of ESPN for the prospective value of an expanded B12 is problematic.

On the other hand, Fox would like to counter the SEC/ESPN deal with as attractive new PAC and B1G offerings (and maybe an expanded B12?) as possible. I'm sure the PAC and B1G don't want to be saddled with just one horse (Fox) going forward, but Fox could be the impetus for PAC and B1G expansion if an expanded B12 doesn't compute.

Again, patience is key.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.