Story Poster
Photo by USA TODAY Sports
Oklahoma State Football

CFP Board of Managers Votes to Expand, Former Big 12 Commish Bob Bowlsby Must Be Smiling

September 2, 2022
4,852

STILLWATER – The CFP Board of Managers made up by University Presidents involved in the CFP have voted unanimously to expand the College Football Playoff to 12 teams by the 2026 season and before, if deemed possible by the CFP Commissioners and Notre Dame athletic director Jack Swarbrick. The Board of Managers held a virtual meeting on Friday (Sept. 2, 2022) and both Sports Illustrated and ESPN simultaneously reported the news. 

“This is an historic and exciting day for college football,” said Mark Keenum, the President of Mississippi State and the chairman of the CFP Board of Managers. “More teams, more participation and more excitement are good for our fans, alumni, and student-athletes. I’m grateful to my colleagues on the board for their thoughtful approach to this issue and for their resolve to get expansion across the goal line and for the extensive work of the Management Committee that made this decision possible.”

Kevin Jairaj-USA TODAY Sports
CFP Trophy on display at Big 12 Media Days.

The Board of Managers accepted the 12-team format that was originally introduced by a special working group that included then Big 12 commissioner Bob Bowlsby, SEC commissioner Greg Sankey, Mountain West commissioner Craig Thompson, and Swarbrick. The format was floated to the CFP members at a time when Sankey and the SEC had accepted Texas and Oklahoma as new future members of the SEC coming from the Big 12. The volatility caused power brokers in college athletics to pause, and the expansion and that format were kicked to the curb. 

Volatility has continued as this summer USC and UCLA announced a move from the Pac-12 Conference to the Big Ten in 2024. The Board of Managers is well aware that the playoff will make all members much more money. To start with ESPN will have to top it’s $470--million rights fees for the current four-team playoff or the event will be bid out to different or additional television outlets. 

The expansion of three games in the playoffs to likely 11-games will increase ticket revenue and more with the additional sites. 

There are many questions involved like whether Power Conferences or any berths will be automatics based on championships. Will the Group of Five be guaranteed a playoff spot? Is it possible they will simply take the top 12 teams in the CFP rankings? 

Initially, it was reported the Board of Managers would leave many decisions up to the Commissioners and Swarbrick, but later it was released by the CFP that the Board made a lot of decisions.

The board approved the following:

1. The 12 teams will be the six conference champions ranked highest by the selection committee (no minimum ranking requirement), plus the six highest-ranked teams not included among the six highest-ranked conference champions.

2. The ranking of the teams will continue to be done by a selection committee whose size, composition, and method of selection will remain substantially unchanged. The Management Committee will modify the selection protocol as required by the change to the playoff structure.

3. The four highest-ranked conference champions will be seeded one through four and each will receive a first-round bye.

4. The other eight teams will play in the first round with the higher seeds hosting the lower seeds either on campus or at other sites designated by the higher-seeded institution (No. 12 at No. 5, No. 11 at No. 6, No. 10 at No. 7 and No. 9 at No. 8.)

5. The model allows for first-round games to be played on either the second or third weekend in December in a way that best accommodates the format and the participating teams, with at least 12 days between the conference championship games and the first-round games. The Management Committee would make the final determination of the calendar. 

6. Subject to reaching agreement with bowls, the four quarterfinal games and two Playoff Semifinal games would be played in bowls on a rotating basis.

7. The national championship game will continue to be played at a neutral site.

Subject to reaching agreement with bowls, the four highest-ranked conference champions will be assigned to quarterfinals bowls on selection day in ranking order, and in consideration of current contract bowl relationships if those bowls are selected for the rotation. For example, if the Pac-12 champion were ranked #1, the Big Ten champion were ranked #3, and the Rose Bowl were a quarterfinal site, the Pac-12 champion would be assigned to the Rose Bowl and the Big Ten champion would be assigned elsewhere.

With the four highest-ranked champions assigned to quarterfinal games in bowls, the opponent from first-round game winners will be assigned by the selection committee based on the bracket.

The higher seeds would receive preferential placement in the Playoff Semifinal games.

First-round games will not have title or presenting sponsors and existing venue signage will remain in place. The CFP will control the video boards.

Kevin Jairaj-USA TODAY Sports
Bob Bowlsby in his last year as Big 12 commissioner had a rought time. 

The board has tasked the College Football Management Committee (the 10 conference commissioners and the Director of Athletics at the University of Notre Dame, who run the playoff) with assessing the possibility of beginning the expanded playoff in either the 2024 or 2025 regular season.

For Bob Bowlsby this is some vindication. Bowlsby seemed hurt when this format was not adopted and came out with criticism. Bowlsby’s last year as commissioner of the Big 12 was rocky mostly due to the announced departure of Texas and Oklahoma. Now Bowlsby’s adoption of BYU, Central Florida, Cincinnati, and Houston as new and added members to the Big 12 is credited in part by new commissioner Brett Yormark for saving the conference and now the format he helped workout has had a successful resurgence. 

Discussion from...

CFP Board of Managers Votes to Expand, Former Big 12 Commish Bob Bowlsby Must Be Smiling

4,162 Views | 11 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by CaliforniaCowboy
Joe Khatib
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yup, BIG can kiss any thoughts of adding Notre Dame GOODBYE!!! Sankey and the other voting members will ensure Notre Dames ability to have access to the expanded CFP ensuring their continued INDEPENDENT STATUS!!!
GumbyFromPokeyLand
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Great news for OSU and the B12.

Cue disagreement by a certain poster in 3, 2, 1…..
Orangeheart72
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OSU would have made this final 12 group twice by now, hopefully 3 times by end of this season!
CaliforniaCowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm thinking with this crap, OSU should join the AAC so we could win it every year and be in the playoff every year.

think outside the box

kiss the bowl games goodbye.... 12 teams get rich while everybody else stays home and does without. How many games does that make it now if you play in your Conf Champ game, and the playin game, then also go all the way to the title game? These are kids. If they're going to be asked to do that, then they need contracts and guaranteed pay for play, and no progress towards a degree requirement
NJAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
While I prefer no playoff, this is an improvement over the 4 team system. I like the level of access, the Big XII will be getting 2 teams in almost every year, and that's good for us and for our value to the TV networks for the regular season. I think its good for OSU because we can regularly be one of those two teams.

In other implications it could save the P12 for now as they now know they'd have a good shot at the playoffs. It also probably changes the B12's thoughts on adding teams as more teams mean more people to share the playoff berths with. So any adds would probably need to be additive and not just pro-rata adds.
Orangeheart72
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We used to have 11 game schedules. With a bowl you had 12. Now it's 12 games and a bowl makes 13. A conf. playoff gives you 14 (assured a bowl at least).
A playoff birth now gives most teams at least 14 and perhaps 15 with 4 participants (ND or BYU are exceptions).
This new set up means you have 14, 15, 16 or 17 games. Going back to 11 regular games would help a tad but Leach's suggestion without conference championship games would also help. Schedules for everyone would place a non-conf game at the end of seasons after a bye. Then a reassignment of the last games of the regular season based on the top 12 determination coming out/projected a week (or two) early occurs. After a bye week, use the (11th) game as a 1st round playoff assignment game played at the highest rated 8 schools. You would keep the system at 12, 13, 14 or current 15 game max for final two teams. Won't happen due to money likely, but it would work if desired. (Example: OU has SMU scheduled for 12th game after a bye week. OSU has Tulsa scheduled for 12th game """. Both OU and OSU make the 12 team playoffs with OSU ranked higher, so OU plays at OSU in playoff/round one and SMU hosts TU in a final regular season game.
GumbyFromPokeyLand
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GumbyFromPokeyLand said:

Great news for OSU and the B12.

Cue disagreement by a certain poster in 3, 2, 1…..


I was right.
GumbyFromPokeyLand
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NJAggie said:

While I prefer no playoff, this is an improvement over the 4 team system. I like the level of access, the Big XII will be getting 2 teams in almost every year, and that's good for us and for our value to the TV networks for the regular season. I think its good for OSU because we can regularly be one of those two teams.

In other implications it could save the P12 for now as they now know they'd have a good shot at the playoffs. It also probably changes the B12's thoughts on adding teams as more teams mean more people to share the playoff berths with. So any adds would probably need to be additive and not just pro-rata adds.


I agree - this move MIGHT save the PAC. But if there's significantly more money to join the B12, they are going to lose some members. I'd predict the PAC will eventually look more like the MWC than the current PAC.
CaliforniaCowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GumbyFromPokeyLand said:

GumbyFromPokeyLand said:

Great news for OSU and the B12.

Cue disagreement by a certain poster in 3, 2, 1…..


I was right.
I actually ignored you completely... but since you couldn't get a fight started with your first post, you had to go and try one more time, didn't you. that's all you do, try to start fights.

Frankly I do not have to agree with you, and even a dead person would know how I would respond, since I have been opposed to ANY and ALL playoffs since they were first proposed and before this 4-team fiasco was implemented.

bully for you.... you were able to finally get one thing right - as easily as predicting the sun will come up tomorrow.

but, then again... you are wrong. You're on the wrong side of what is good for college football tradition.

This isn't it.

you had nothing to say about my comments... nothing at all.. zero, zip, zilch..... you are only focused on "being right", not on having civil discussions. I am entitled to not have your opinion - because it's always wrong
GumbyFromPokeyLand
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CaliforniaCowboy said:

GumbyFromPokeyLand said:

GumbyFromPokeyLand said:

Great news for OSU and the B12.

Cue disagreement by a certain poster in 3, 2, 1…..


I was right.
I actually ignored you completely... but since you couldn't get a fight started with your first post, you had to go and try one more time, didn't you. that's all you do, try to start fights.

Frankly I do not have to agree with you, and even a dead person would know how I would respond, since I have been opposed to ANY and ALL playoffs since they were first proposed and before this 4-team fiasco was implemented.

bully for you.... you were able to finally get one thing right - as easily as predicting the sun will come up tomorrow.

but, then again... you are wrong. You're on the wrong side of what is good for college football tradition.

This isn't it.

you had nothing to say about my comments... nothing at all.. zero, zip, zilch..... you are only focused on "being right", not on having civil discussions. I am entitled to not have your opinion - because it's always wrong


I wasn't going to waste the electrons. Everyone had their expectations. They were confirmed.
CaliforniaCowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GumbyFromPokeyLand said:





I wasn't going to waste the electrons. Everyone had their expectations. They were confirmed.
It took you 3 edits to come up with that brilliance?

talk about a waste of electrons

and a waste of my time.... leave me alone, I don't care what your opinion is, or how many media types like the continued erosion of college football. it's just as dumb as the the silly basketball playin compromise.

It should have been 8 or 16, this is completely ignorant. Endless mindless debates about who should have gotten a bye, and pushing the "they should have gotten in" down to the level of irrelevance.

Your opinions are always aligned with the continued destruction of the college sport, I doubt I'll have any opinions that align with yours..... just let it be. Wisper words of wisdom, let it be.

Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.