Story Poster
Photo by Bruce Waterfield/OSU Athletics

Big 12 Conference Votes to Settle House vs. NCAA

May 21, 2024
3,347

STILLWATER – The Big 12 may very well be leading the way this week. Pokes Report learned Oklahoma State President Dr. Kayse Shrum was on a video conference with her fellow Presidents and Chancellors in the Big 12 Conference at noon today and they voted to approve the settlement with the plaintiffs in the House vs. NCAA lawsuit. They are the first of the plaintiffs; which also includes the NCAA membership and other power conferences ACC, Big Ten, Pac-12, and SEC; to take this action. 

The vote was unanimous with soon-to-be departing members Oklahoma and Texas adstaining. ESPN originally reported this news. 

The other defendants in the case of the NCAA and that organization’s Board of Governors and the other Power Five conferences are expected to vote on the settlement later this week. Work on negotiating this settlement has been going on for months. 

The lawsuit was initially started by former Arizona State swimmer Grant House along with former Oregon and current TCU women’s basketball player Sedona Prince. They were the initial two plaintiffs, but the suit became a class-action suit involving thousands of athletes that believe they were denied by the NCAA their rights to earn money from their name, image, and likeness as athlete’s are allowed to do now. There are two other related lawsuits that this settlement will help to close as well.

The settlement will keep the damages to be paid to the plaintiff’s athletes to approximately $2.7 billion. If the defendants were to take this to court then with treble damages the final number could have ballooned to as much as $20 billion. The settlement also has a built in framework that will require Power Conference schools to share approximately $20 million of major revenue based on network television rights fees with the current student athletes. This will actually help the schools get past the third party collectives that have been involved in the distribution of NIL (really pay-for-play) monies to the student-athletes. 

This will be a longer process. The judge in the case, Senior District Judge Claudia Wilkin, will be able to approve the settlement, but this process will likely take 6-18 months. Details will need to be worked out. All Division I athletes have the opportunity to object to the terms or opt out of the class. There will be a preliminary hearing on the terms of the settlement and the judge will listen to any arguments against the settlement. This will all take time. 

Congress could way in on the suit and that is what some in the college sports business are hoping. Meanwhile, the NCAA, conferences, and the schools will need to come up with a plan to pay the financial settlement and make plans for adjusting budgets to pay the future revenue sharing dictated in the settlement. 

Schools, including some in the Big 12 have suggested budget cuts, layoffs, or dropping some sports. Iowa State recently suspended a major wrestling facilities project. The other ramification of this could be major college football separating from the athletic department and becoming a professional or semi-professional operation. This is the future “super league” and NFL-type model that has long been rumored. 

The Big 12 can’t do anything until all other defendents vote to accept the settlement. 

Discussion from...

Big 12 Conference Votes to Settle House vs. NCAA

2,699 Views | 10 Replies | Last: 5 mo ago by RodeoPoke
TUSKAPOKE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Time to bury the inept NCAA and evolve. Put Sankey in charge and get football in the new structure and the other sports will follow.
NJAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think we still have some way to go, as I believe they are going to go with the continuing litigation plan instead of unionization of athletes. So we'll have a few more settlements before they stop the bleeding and move to unionization. That is the only option the legal system has left for them so sad to see them not taking it now.
NJAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just ran across this. It estimates the losses per conference.


RowdyRawhide
How long do you want to ignore this user?
These school administrators have no problem giving away "other people's money".

They did the same thing when they let the Sooners and Longhorns skate when they owed

millions to the remaining Big 12 members. OSU needs a president that understands how to run a business

and will fight for the school's money. It is amazing how quickly all of the schools and their administrators caved!
RodeoPoke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
very stupid, IMO.

Challenge the amount, and then seek reduction in appeal.

Ridiculous to accept such and outrageous amount.

aggie1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you were in charge it would be $20B. Some people have a brain like Biden.
RodeoPoke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggie1 said:

If you were in charge it would be $20B. Some people have a brain like Biden.
why are you attacking me? You have no clue what the amount would be if I were in charge.

People with a brain like Biden insist on spewing personal attacks on others regardless of any factual evidence
NJAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RodeoPoke said:

aggie1 said:

If you were in charge it would be $20B. Some people have a brain like Biden.
why are you attacking me? You have no clue what the amount would be if I were in charge.

People with a brain like Biden insist on spewing personal attacks on others regardless of any factual evidence
Well you say challenge the result and appeal. I'm sure they considered that, but the facts are the courts are clearly not going to lower amounts or reverse verdict. The facts they were working with was settle by Thursday or it will be a bigger award.

The schools made a massive mistake for years by ignoring this issue and its now coming due. I don't like it either, but those are the facts that go to court and result in having to deal with this.

The next question is not so much how this is going to affect us, but how the schools react to eliminate future issues. This case only settles this for kids currently in school or in school for the previous period of about 10 years. Future classes may also be able to sue, and may in this settlement have the right to challenge for more money.

That makes it imperative that this gets fixed so there can be no more suits.

The courts are basically saying be like a pro league and have employees with a cba so that they have no claim on their share.
Duke Silver
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RodeoPoke said:

aggie1 said:

If you were in charge it would be $20B. Some people have a brain like Biden.
why are you attacking me? You have no clue what the amount would be if I were in charge.

People with a brain like Biden insist on spewing personal attacks on others regardless of any factual evidence
Dude, he wasn't.
RodeoPoke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NJAggie said:

RodeoPoke said:

aggie1 said:

If you were in charge it would be $20B. Some people have a brain like Biden.
why are you attacking me? You have no clue what the amount would be if I were in charge.

People with a brain like Biden insist on spewing personal attacks on others regardless of any factual evidence
Well you say challenge the result and appeal. I'm sure they considered that, but the facts are the courts are clearly not going to lower amounts or reverse verdict. The facts they were working with was settle by Thursday or it will be a bigger award.

The schools made a massive mistake for years by ignoring this issue and its now coming due. I don't like it either, but those are the facts that go to court and result in having to deal with this.

The next question is not so much how this is going to affect us, but how the schools react to eliminate future issues. This case only settles this for kids currently in school or in school for the previous period of about 10 years. Future classes may also be able to sue, and may in this settlement have the right to challenge for more money.

That makes it imperative that this gets fixed so there can be no more suits.

The courts are basically saying be like a pro league and have employees with a cba so that they have no claim on their share.
thanks for the apology.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.