Story Poster
Photo by ACC, Big Ten, Pac-12
Oklahoma State Football

The Alliance Is Announced, Pretty Much Exactly What We Thought

August 24, 2021
4,570

STILLWATER – It is out there now. There is no signed deal, but the Atlantic Coast Conference, Big Ten Conference and Pac-12 Conference are now aligned. More than anything it is a spiritual and philosophical alliance. The three conferences say they believe in the college athletics model, and they want to make decisions together that are best for the student-athletes and for the model of college athletics the way it has been and fight to keep the ideals of college sports across the board.

After the initial announcement the three commissioners of the conferences in Jim Phillips of the ACC, Kevin Warren of the Big Ten and George Kliavkoff of the Pac-12 all agreed they don’t need a contract.

ACC
Jim Phillips is the ACC Commissioner.

“The ACC, Big Ten and Pac-12 recognize the unique environment and challenges currently facing intercollegiate athletics, and we are proud and confident in this timely and necessary alliance that brings together like-minded institutions and conferences focused on the overall educational missions of our preeminent institutions,” said ACC Commissioner Jim Phillips. “The alliance will ensure that the educational outcomes and experiences for student-athletes participating at the highest level of collegiate athletics will remain the driving factor in all decisions moving forward.”

The commissioners acknowledged there is no contract, there is no timeline and there really are no hard fast rules. This is where philosophy comes in. They said the intent is to schedule football games, men’s basketball, women’s basketball and Olympic sports events between and involving the three conferences. It was pointed out that the conferences already have nearly 100 future games schedule against each other.

Big Ten commissioner Kevin Warren said there is no desire to tear up any existing contracts for nonconference games with teams in other conferences just to do new contracts with teams in the alliance. It is more of a promise of working together when it is possible.

The emphasis on student-athletes was apparent and almost flown, maybe subtly flown in the face of the SEC and there is no doubt the alliance was a response of the Southeastern Conference taking Texas and Oklahoma from the Big 12 Conference.

“Student-athletes have been and will remain the focal point of the Big Ten, ACC and Pac-12 Conferences,” said Warren. “Today, through this alliance, we furthered our commitment to our student-athletes by prioritizing our academics and athletics value systems. We are creating opportunities for student-athletes to have elite competition and are taking the necessary steps to shape and stabilize the future of college athletics.”

Pac-12 Conference
Pac-12 Commissioner George Kliavkoff

“The historic alliance announced today between the Pac-12, ACC and Big Ten is grounded in a commitment to our student-athletes,” said Pac-12 Commissioner George Kliavkoff. “We believe that collaborating together we are stronger in our commitment to addressing the broad issues and opportunities facing college athletics.”

Then a little later a reporter asked about money, doesn’t anybody care about the money. The answer in short, yes, they care about the money. It just wasn’t the message they were wanting to get out today.

Discussion from...

The Alliance Is Announced, Pretty Much Exactly What We Thought

3,959 Views | 5 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by Orangeheart72
Joe Khatib
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I do enjoy seeing people give a middle finger to Greg Sankey!
CowboyKip
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not much of a finger. All they said is that the three of them are friends. What is not said is that they are not friends with the SEC. They will still work with them, but they aren't friends. Also, there aren't any protections, controls, or commitments. Pretty fluffy stuff.
CaliforniaCowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
a whole bunch of nothing..... the Pac12 jerk said, "yuck, yuck, yuck, we don't want the playoff expansion, because the elimination of the B12 means our teams may finally make the playoff... wink, wink, wink, yuck, yuck, yuck)

collectively they said, "we're not going to do anything or say anything for 4 years, then our contracts are up. Check back with us then - yuck, yuck, yuck)"

NJAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No they said things. It just was very much we're allied to push the clock back some.

The biggest comment was that the playoffs need to include the Rose Bowl with the PAC/B1G champs playing. That pretty much cuts the SEC's plans to enlarge the playoffs and cuts into their promises of money and playoff spots to all those top end teams they've convinced to join.

The SEC is probably meeting right now to figure out their next move.

I really feel we're headed for a split.
Orangeheart72
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It may be an important statement if in fact it means 75% of major conferences won't throw competitive student/athletic and some competition equalization rules out the window. The SEC then has to decide to agree with some of those rules they don't feel otherwise useful or necessary OR go into an isolation situation within their own conference and playoff system. Additionally, if this involves some reasonable standards on maintaining basic academic qualifications, number of paid scholarships (instead of SEC preferring substantial increases), recruiting restrictions, etc., the AAC, Big (8), etc. probably will align in votes with this non-SEC alliance IMO, making it even more impactful IF the NCAA continues to have any meaningful administrative impact on the SEC.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.