Story Poster
Photo by Pat Kinnison - Chief Photographer
Oklahoma State Football

Mike Gundy Gets New Contract Terms Making Him Highest Paid Coach in Big 12

March 25, 2022
18,110

STILLWATER – Oklahoma State University and its Board of Regents have approved new contract terms for Cowboys head football coach Mike Gundy that were brought to the board primarily by the school’s athletics director Chad Weiberg. The new terms make Gundy the highest paid football head coach in the Big 12 Conference and the highest paid coach in Oklahoma State history. In the first year of the new terms, which is the upcoming year of 2022, Gundy will receive $7.46-million. The total value of the contract for the first five-years is $38.25-million.

Year Salary Total Compensation with Year End Bonus
2022 $6.4-million $7.46-million
2023 $6.525-million $7.525-million
2024 $6.65-million $7.65-million
2025 $6.775-million $7.775-million
2026 $6.9-million $7.9-million

The overall terms for the five-year rollover deal remain the same with the perpetual rollover. Gundy receives a $1-million raise in annual salary and then at the end of the calendar year in December, he receives what could be considered a $1-million stay bonus. Should Gundy no longer be the coach at the end of the calendar year then that bonus would not be paid. Gundy also receives a $125,000 increase in salary each year.

Before these new terms were negotiated and taken to and approved by the Oklahoma State University System Board of Regents, Gundy was scheduled to make $5-million in 2022. The buyouts are steep for the University if they were to fire Gundy without cause and for Gundy, if he were to try to leave for any other position.

Oklahoma State has been getting a premier football program for a steal, and even now with the increased salaries for Gundy and all football staff is getting more than their monies worth. With the wins, football revenue, football attention and marketing, OSU is still getting a great deal on the investment. Also, national media will now see this and truly believe Oklahoma State is serious about being a leader in college football’s future.

The Cowboys head coach to the media earlier this week before the first spring practice that he and his entire coaching and support staff had been taken care of by adminstration.

“Between Dr. Shrum and Chad Weiberg, they've completely revamped our people that work in that football building financially. I mean, they've taken care of football and taken football to a level that with the exception of Oklahoma and Texas — which I don't know if we'll be in their category budget-wise in my lifetime, but a year or two from now they won't be in our league, so I don't have to worry about that — but for the most part, they've taken the staff and everybody in that building to a level financially that will be the tops in this league,” Gundy said. “That is a huge commitment because that keeps continuity and structure. There's almost 100 people that work in our building in all different areas, and the large majority of them have been with us or with me a long time and that helps me. So in my opinion and when they make that commitment, they're showing that football is important and it gives us a chance to play at a high level."

We know that new defensive coordinator Derek Mason accepted a two-year contract for $1.1-million per year. He had been paid $1.5-million at Auburn. We know that all of the Oklahoma State full-time assistant coaches are receiving raises and most new contracts, since those were allowed to lapse during the COVID-19 pandemic. Those salaries had not all been announced or Pokes Report had not learned them. We believe that Kasey Dunn will move close to the $1-million mark. Senior staffers such as linebackers coach Joe Bob Clements, corners coach Tim Duffie, and safeties coach Dan Hammerschmidt will be in the $600,000-$800,000 range. All assistants received increased salaries. 

Pat Kinnison - Chief Photographer
Oklahoma State football has has unprecedented success under Gundy.

Gundy, a former quarterback at the school and one of the all-time winningest quarterbacks at Oklahoma State , has been a position coach, an offensive coordinator for both Pat Jones and then later for Les Miles, before becoming head coach prior to 2005. Gundy has become the Cowboys all-time winning head football coach with a record of 149-69 in his 17 seasons.

He has led Oklahoma State to the Big 12 Conference Championship in 2011 and the Big 12 Championship Game in 2021. He has led the program to 16 straight bowl games and winning seasons. His teams have played in two Cotton Bowls, two Fiesta Bowls, and a Sugar Bowl making five New Year’s Six games. His out of conference wins include Alabama, Notre Dame, Miami (Fla.), Stanford, Georgia, Washington, Virginia Tech, Pittsburgh, and Boise State.

Gundy is a multiple Big 12 Coach of the Year award winner and has also won National Coach of the Year awards.

Discussion from...

Mike Gundy Gets New Contract Terms Making Him Highest Paid Coach in Big 12

17,613 Views | 51 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by LS1Z28
CaliforniaCowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GumbyFromPokeyLand said:

If you assume for a minute the NCAA would recognize self-penalties, there was only two opportunities to cut schollys.

1. After June 2020 and before the 20-21 season. That would mean you'd have to withdraw 3 of the 4 scholarships from Cade's freshman class. Assuming you keep Cunningham, that would mean Walker, Moncrief and Williams. Of course Cunningham would probably have wanted out.

2. Sometime before the 21-22 season not give out 3 of the 4 new scholarships- Cisse, Smith, Thompson or Newton.

Last I heard, it's not even clear if it's 3 scholarships per year for 3 years, 3 scholarships for one year, or a single-year scholarship for 3 years. Maybe someone knows for sure.

sorry Charlie, you're wrong again.

We could have self-imposed a scholly immediately, just like we suspended Carroll. These actions happen ALL THE TIME, and the NCAA always accepts them, but they sometimes say it's not enough (like they did with us)

"The NCAA also reduced Oklahoma State's men's basketball scholarships by three during the 2020-21 through 2022-23 academic years and imposed other recruiting restrictions. The Cowboys had previously self-imposed a $10,000 fine plus 1% of its men's basketball operating budget and reduced the number of official visits for three years."

Arizona self-imposed a post season ban, so stop saying it can't be done, and isn't normal, because it is.

Lastly, it is clear to everybody that the 3 ships can be spread over 3-years, that has already been discussed and settled, even by Robert. The only potential is how the delay from the appeal might work. I presume it simply extends like it did for the post-season ban.


------------------

Here's another penalty that we self-imposed

  • A prohibition of the men's basketball staff from participating in off-campus evaluations for three consecutive days during the summer evaluation periods in 2020 (self-imposed by the university).

https://www.cbssports.com/college-basketball/news/oklahoma-state-hit-with-one-year-postseason-ban-for-ncaa-violations-uncovered-in-fbi-investigation/
GumbyFromPokeyLand
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CaliforniaCowboy said:

GumbyFromPokeyLand said:

Yeah, penalize yourself before the penalty is finalized. And where does it say a self-imposed penalty would be recognized as a penalty?

Nonetheless, great plan.
earth to Gumby..

WE DID self impose penalties, and the NCAA DID accept those penalties. We suspended Carroll for some games, and we immediately fired Evans, and there may have been some money reductions too, I'd have to look it up.

Besides, the penalties that we're talking about WERE NOT SELF IMPOSED, they were penalties already set by the NCAA, but WE delayed them through the appeal process... which, as you know, we lost.

The NCAA MUST recognize their own penalties.

You're just wrong, you're always wrong.




Suspending Carroll was not done so to comply with an NCAA penalty.
Firing Evans was not done so to comply with an NCAA penalty.
Appealing or not appealing the NCAA penalties was not within Boyntons control. As NJ pointed out, self-imposing an NCAA penalty while at the same time appealing that penalty is a tacit admission of the fairness of the penalties at best, and an unnecessary hardship to place on your players, potential players, fans, coaches and program if the appeal is granted. Otherwise,,why appeal in the first place? It's one thing to self-impose penalties considered "fair" under the circumstances. It's quite another to self-impose penalties you consider (the reason for the appeal) unfair. Losing scholarships was clearly within the realm of unfair with regards to the appeal of our penalties.

If you think this is wrong, that's your opinion. And if I'm wrong, then I'm sure the many intelligent posters on here will let me know I'm wrong.
.
CaliforniaCowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oh good lord...

that's about the most ignorant post that I've ever read.

moving on

BTW - you're wrong again, you're always wrong
Polston31
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I bet y'all can stretch this one out 10 days easy
NJAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CaliforniaCowboy said:

GumbyFromPokeyLand said:

Yeah, penalize yourself before the penalty is finalized. And where does it say a self-imposed penalty would be recognized as a penalty?

Nonetheless, great plan.
earth to Gumby..

WE DID self impose penalties, and the NCAA DID accept those penalties. We suspended Carroll for some games, and we immediately fired Evans, and there may have been some money reductions too, I'd have to look it up.

Besides, the penalties that we're talking about WERE NOT SELF IMPOSED, they were penalties already set by the NCAA, but WE delayed them through the appeal process... which, as you know, we lost.

The NCAA MUST recognize their own penalties.

You're just wrong, you're always wrong.


Those were not penalties they were corrections. They were taken in anticipation of them moderating the penalties.
CaliforniaCowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
you got crossed up in the discussion.

we were discussing the actual penalties that were imposed, in addition to those we self-imposed.

as for the self-imposed, some of them were implemented by the NCAA ($10k penalty, and visits, etc.), while the other self-imposed penalties (as per NCAA minimum guidelines for such infractions) (Carroll suspension, repayment of money, and firing coach) were conducted to reduce/avoid further penalties by the NCAA, as you pointed out. (i.e., the NCAA did not punish OSU for playing a possible ineligible player (Carroll).



GumbyFromPokeyLand
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CaliforniaCowboy said:

oh good lord...

that's about the most ignorant post that I've ever read.

moving on

BTW - you're wrong again, you're always wrong


I'm curious.

Since all the way back to June 2020 you were advocating a self-imposed scholarship reduction before the start of the 20-21 season, I can only assume you were also advocating a self-imposed post-season ban for the 20-21 season, correct? Thus, since you were advocating a self-imposition of ALL NCAA penalties, you were also advocating OSU NOT appeal the NCAA penalties, correct?

How many scholarships would you have cut? Which players would you have denied a scholarship?

What would have been your message to the team? Fans?

You've clearly thought this through. I'll admit, I haven't and am always wrong anyway. What would you have told your team and fans if the administration had overruled your desire to not fight the penalties, and the NCAA decided to rule in favor of the appeal?

Help us out by answering the above questions. You're holding Boynton accountable for not self-imposing the NCAA penalties. Fans (and I) want to know how Boynton could better run the program. Thanks in advance for your wisdom in this matter.
CaliforniaCowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
correction, that post is just as ignorant. (notice I said that "the post" was ignorant, not the poster)

the penalties WERE ASSESSED so they would NOT BE self imposed at that point. These are real penalties... that were assessed against us. We ALSO self imposed some on ourselves. I'm only talking about the actual penalties assessed.

good lord....

stop trying to pick a fight.

we just had the post season ban.... all of it could be over by now, and we would have no more excuses.

but it's not over, no matter how you try to twist my comment into some absurd statement that you can ague with.

you're wrong again, because I never said those things... YOU made them up with your own assumptions about what you wanted my statement to say or mean.

just stop trying to fight with everybody... this discussion has run it's course.
GumbyFromPokeyLand
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No need to get upset, I'm just trying to understand your comment;

" all I said is quit making freaking excuses for him, he's the highest paid ever and hasn't gotten it done.... we could be out of this scholarship mess, but he gave one to Little Country, and another walk-on, I believe.

there is absolutely no need for us to be in this position, with a coach that can't figure out which guys to start."

…and reconcile that comment with the reality of the situation. The NCAA initially handed out our penalties in June 2020 (after Trey Reeves exhausted his eligibility). OSU immediately appealed those penalties, thus suspending the imposition of the penalties until the appeal was decided (which ultimately occurred in Nov 2021). How could we have predicted it would take 17 months to decide the appeal, thus delaying the penalties?

Are(were) you an advocate of appealing all the NCAA penalties? Or only some of the penalties (if that's even possible)? Appeals cost money. Why would we spend money to appeal a penalty we intend to serve before the appeal is decided?

Are/were you an advocate of immediately reducing scholarships for the 20-21 season? How many? Who? Someone(s) already on scholarship? How does that work? By July 2020 the school had already signed financial aid agreements with at least 12 athletes. Are you advocating "breaking" one or more of those agreements?

If you're not advocating breaking any of the 20-21 scholarship agreements, are you advocating reducing the 21-22 scholarship count by 2 or 3? Would you just not sign 2 or 3 new players, or cut one or more veteran players already on scholarship? How does that work and which players would be casualties?

Assuming you were an advocate of pursuing the appeal, how would you then justify a roster with reduced scholarships if the appeal was subsequently granted?

You're clearly not giving Boynton any kind of pass in coming seasons because he has to navigate with reduced scholarship numbers - because he should have already taken the scholarship hits. Im not saying it couldn't be done, I'm just trying to understand how that would have been realistically possible and how it could have been implemented, and the impact on our existing roster.

If in your view our scholarship reductions should have already been served, I can only assume there are players currently on the team that would have either never been signed, or cut loose - thus impacting next seasons roster. Are you still not willing to give Boynton a pass in 22-23 for the damage to the 22-23 roster by serving the scholarship penalties in the 20-21 and/or 21-22 seasons?

I'm sure everyone would love to have all the penalties behind us, especially Boynton. But I am absolutely bumfuzzled how Boynton could have realistically already served the scholarship reduction penalties. Maybe I'm missing something.
CaliforniaCowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm not upset.

You just want to fight, and argue and twist what others say.

The discussion has run it course.

May God bless you
GumbyFromPokeyLand
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I guess I'm left to conclude all my previous assumptions about your stance/beliefs are in fact true.

Thanks for the discourse.
CaliforniaCowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GumbyFromPokeyLand said:

I guess I'm left to conclude all my previous assumptions about your stance/beliefs are in fact true.

Thanks for the discourse.
dude, you concluded and assumed all through the thread.

there was no discourse, only you making wild allegations and trying to pick a fight.

Best of luck to you
GumbyFromPokeyLand
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Thanks for the discourse" = facetious.

SMH
Polston31
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CaliforniaCowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GumbyFromPokeyLand said:

"Thanks for the discourse" = facetious.

SMH
ahh yes, silly me, I know by now that I should always expect nothing for facetiousness from you.


facetiousness and personal attacks and unsupported rumors and only posting to provoke others.... such as making facetious retorts

what is wrong with you? (I apologize in advance if my question invokes a Chris Rock faux pas on my part)
LS1Z28
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I honestly don't think the scholarship reductions will be a big deal. We had 4 scholarship players this year that rarely saw the court. Dropping down to 12 scholarships over the next 3 years will just mean that we have 1 less player taking up a spot at the end of the bench.
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.