Story Poster
Photo by Matt Cashore-USA TODAY Sports
Oklahoma State Football

A New Player in Media Rights for Big Ten Could Impact Big 12

February 17, 2022
7,624

STILLWATER – The Big 12 Conference, especially with the four new schools that will be added as soon as the 2023-24 school year, will be looking on with great curiosity and interest as the Big Ten Conference with their media rights ending in 2023-2024 and the Pac-12 Conference also up ahead of the Big 12 with their multi-media rights contract with FOX and ESPN concluding in the 2023-24 school year negotiate future deals. There was word breaking today that a new player is in play for the Big Ten.

The Big 12 with announced departures in the University of Texas and University of Oklahoma has a contract with ESPN and FOX that goes through the 2024-25 school year. New contracts can be expected to be negotiated in advance of the end of the current deals. For instance, the Southeastern Conference already has a deal in place with ESPN that will replace the agreement that league has with CBS that runs through 2022-23. That new deal is worth $3-billion and will pay the league $300-million on an annual basis.

USA TODAY Sports
FOX Sports currently has Big Ten rights.

Word today with a report from Mike McCarthy at Front Office Sports is that NBC is interested in the Big Ten. Industry experts believe the Big Ten rights package could approach $1.1-billion annually. The current contract for the Big Ten, which FOX as the heavy pays the conference around $440-million annually. A new deal in the neighborhood of that $1.1-billion would be a huge increase.

Nobody from NBC commented on the report, but the Front Office Sports report had sources from NBC and in the industry saying the Peacock Network, which also streams now on Peacock views the Big Ten as the perfect league to pair with their exclusive agreement with Notre Dame.

It is agreed that the SEC and Big Ten will be the leagues with the largest media rights contract. The ACC extended what was originally a 12-year deal with ESPN and had the objective of getting exposure through an ACC Network. They got the network, but they also got an unfavorable rights deal financially all the way through 2036. They will make a fraction of what schools in the SEC and likely Big Ten will be making.

Pokes Report
The Pac-12 and Big-12 negotiate last in this round of media rights negotiations. Could a partnership be created?

The Pac-12 has a fairly new commissioner in George Kliavkoff and he will be watching all this carefully. The Pac-12 issues are not having any schools east of the mountain time zone making the popular noon kickoff window in the eastern time zone very difficult for their league. Competition is a problem as well. The Pac-12 just hasn’t been relevant in college football like they used to be.

The Big 12 and commissioner Bob Bowlsby steadied their ship with the addition of Cincinnati, Houston, Central Florida, and BYU. Those four schools give them a major religious school in BYU, the school of the Mormon faith; and then a school in the upper Midwest to join West Virginia in Cincinnati; an avenue into Florida with UCF; and another Texas school in a major metropolitan area in Houston.

The question is how much can the new Big 12 get in television rights. If FOX is left out of the Big Ten they will have more money to spend on the Big 12 and/or Pac-12. There are other entities that might be interested such as Amazon, which is now carrying NFL football on Thursday nights, Netflix, Hulu, and other streaming networks could be interested.

After the Big Ten negotiations, the Big 12 and Pac-12 could look into some sort of consolidation or partnership and even bid their media rights in partnership. It would solve some problems each one has and potentially get more money for all of its’ members combined.

Discussion from...

A New Player in Media Rights for Big Ten Could Impact Big 12

6,840 Views | 6 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by NJAggie
Orangeheart72
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Perhaps a Big XII/PAC XII agreement to have OOC games spread through season to benefit both financially. Gives Pac a timeslot solution and Big XII more bargaining position with networks (California and Phoenix markets).
CaliforniaCowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Orangeheart72 said:

Perhaps a Big XII/PAC XII agreement to have OOC games spread through season to benefit both financially. Gives Pac a timeslot solution and Big XII more bargaining position with networks (California and Phoenix markets).
That's an interesting alignment... I wonder if it would have the effect that you're suggesting though.

Here is a link not of city "TV markets" (California, Phoenix), but of TVs that viewed games each week, by game/by network. if you scroll down past the bowls and the conf champ games to "week 13", you can see how many viewer actually tuned in to watch games, at what time, and on which network. Near the very bottom of that list for Week 13 are a slew of B12 games .... the Pac games had better viewership.

I think that your concept is right about the Pac getting games with other leagues, but this ancillary data suggests that the B12 might not be the league to deliver a ratings boost.

https://www.sportsmediawatch.com/college-football-tv-ratings/

(I did not look at any other Weeks)
CaliforniaCowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
on second thought....

perhaps there is some solace in the fact that so many of our B12 games were actually broadcast, where so many leagues "other teams" were not.

CaliforniaCowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
letting my mind wander, as it frequently does, I was wondering whether former players would also be eligible to enter their names into this NIL opportunity... like, say.... Leroy Colmbs or Matt Clark, or other former Cowboy greats.... and pull in some overdue financial rewards......

I mean, who would not plunk down the cost of a Blond Bomber jersey, or Lonnie Boeckman?

Orangeheart72
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Probably true Cal, but that's why I said offers the Pac a timeslot improvement and the BXII a marketing improvement. And geographically and weather wise, better travel games for Pac than B10 option. 6 schools south of Kansas's southern border vs entire B10 to north.
NJAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I really don't see anything occurring with the PAC 12. They are set in pushing forward alone as no one else is good enough for them. And, frankly they don't bring much to the table. No one watches their games in person or on TV.

The Big XII has better ratings, better time slots, and with the new schools big new markets in FL, OH, & UT opening up new viewers to our games. Even losing the two flagship schools we are better off with the 4 new schools than we were with OU/UT and no expansion. The Big XII will easily be the #3 league and in a good position to get good money. Not B1G money, but as much or more per team than we're making now.

I do think we're better off with NBC getting the B1G contract as NBC could easily say fine we'll just stay with ND. FOX on the other hand would need to fill all those time slots both the ones we have now, and the ones that a B1G exit leaves them.

The shocking thing is that the B1G is looking at nearly tripling the SEC if those numbers are correct ($1.1B vs $300M). But that's where the TV sets are. Even really bad B1G match ups on tier 2 carriers draw good numbers.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.